Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42553081›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in sociology2026

"You lose confidence in yourself, I think, a little bit…" A qualitative study exploring the perceptions and experiences of the barriers and facilitators to wellbeing in women in work over 60 years old.

Clare Edge, Giulia Bacci

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in sociology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Clare EdgeSchool of Health & Society, University of Salford, Salford, United Kingdom.
Giulia BacciDepartment of Psychology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Life stress accumulation across the life course disproportionately negatively impacts wellbeing, cognition, and health in ageing women, yet there is a paucity of research exploring the perceptions of ageing women in work. Methods: This study draws upon unique data to provide an understanding through illuminating the intersectional wellbeing of gendered ageing in ageing women in the workplace in UK focusing on lower-paid roles in the Northwest of England. Semi-structured interviews were used to explore the perceptions of older women's wellbeing in an opportunity sample of ( Results: There were two central themes: Barriers to Wellbeing and Facilitators to Wellbeing. Barriers to wellbeing encompassed the following subthemes: (1) the Taboo of Womanhood: the limiting nature of being an ageing woman as a barrier to wellbeing; (2) Feeling of Invisibility: intergenerational barriers to wellbeing; (3) The workplace environment: prolonged standing, and physical and emotional strain nature of role as a barrier to wellbeing; (4) Negative self-perceptions of growing old: health deteriorations, mortality perceptions, and lack of energy; (5) Financial factors as a barrier to ageing women's workplace wellbeing. Whereas facilitators to wellbeing were encompassed in the following subthemes: (1) The value of older women in work as a facilitator to wellbeing; (2) Support from line manager as a facilitator to wellbeing; (3) Rejecting the label/stereotype as 'older' as a facilitator to wellbeing. Discussion: Workplace policies and practices should actively challenge the taboo surrounding women's wellbeing, value older women in work, and provide flexible, supportive environments and management that enable open conversations and respond to women's changing needs across the life course.

Indexed as

ageingintersectionalitywellbeingwomenworkplace

Identifiers

PMID42553081
PMCPMC13433216

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.