ArticleClinical & translational immunology2026
Humoral and cellular responses to SARS-CoV-2 variants after ancestral COVID-19 vaccines in people with HIV and lung transplant recipients.
Article in Clinical & translational immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Immunocompromised hosts have reduced immune responses to COVID-19 vaccination, and more severe disease. Antibody responses correlate with protection but markers of immunity vary across a spectrum of immunocompromise. We compared serologic and cellular responses following Ancestral COVID-19 vaccines in healthy controls (HC), people with HIV (PWH) and lung transplant (LTx) recipients. Methods: Anti-spike receptor binding domain (RBD) IgG, neutralising antibodies (nAb) and T-cell responses were assessed one-month post-dose 2 and dose 3 of Ancestral COVID-19 vaccination in HC, PWH and LTx. NAb responses to Ancestral, Delta and Omicron BA.2 and BA.5 variants were assessed. Results: Twenty-nine HC, 21 PWH and 12 LTx recipients were included. PWH demonstrated lower anti-RBD-IgG responses (median post-dose 3: 80.3 μg mL Conclusion: Although Dose 3 was beneficial, LTx recipients demonstrated lower serological responses than HC, while reductions were modest in PWH. Immunocompromised groups had reduced but detectable SARS-CoV-2-specific T-cell responses, demonstrating the utility of COVID-19 vaccination despite poorer serological responses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.