ArticleLaryngoscope investigative otolaryngology2026
Inpatient and Postacute Care After Head and Neck Surgery Among Beneficiaries.
Article in Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Medicare Advantage (MA) enrollment has grown rapidly, yet its implications for resource use in complex head and neck cancer (HNC) surgery remain unclear. Methods: Using 2019-2023 Medicare Provider Analysis and Review data, we identified adults admitted with an HNC diagnosis who underwent a qualifying head and neck surgical procedure. We used 1:1 propensity score matching to balance MA and traditional fee-for-service (FFS) beneficiaries on demographics, comorbidity, region, and admitting diagnosis. Outcomes included index length of stay (LOS) and discharge destination (home, home with home health, skilled nursing facility/rehabilitation, or hospice). Negative binomial and multinomial logistic regression models were used to estimate associations between insurance type and LOS or discharge disposition. Results: The matched cohort included 4618 admissions (2309 MA; 2309 FFS). Mean LOS was similar for MA and FFS patients (7.1 vs. 7.3 days), and discharge destination distributions were not significantly different. MA admissions had lower observed frequencies of selected complex procedure categories, including reconstructive surgery, neck dissection, laryngectomy, and mandibulectomy. In procedure-adjusted sensitivity models, MA enrollment was not associated with LOS (rate ratio 0.99, 95% CI 0.94-1.03) or discharge destination. Conclusions: Among Medicare beneficiaries hospitalized for HNC surgery, short-term inpatient utilization during the index admission was similar for MA and FFS enrollees. MA admissions had lower observed frequencies of selected complex procedure categories; however, this finding should be interpreted as a difference in observed operative mix rather than direct evidence of reduced access. Further studies linking claims to tumor registry and hospital-level data are needed to determine whether these patterns reflect case mix, treatment selection, hospital networks, or access barriers. Level of Evidence: 3.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.