ArticleCancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center
Development of Implementation Strategies to Facilitate a Novel, Clinically-Relevant Hospital-Based Cancer Registry Network Across Ethiopia.
Article in Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
IntroductionCancer registries are essential for surveillance and cancer control, yet many pediatric oncology registries capture limited longitudinal clinical data and are not designed to support care continuity or active follow-up. In low- and middle-income settings, this limits the ability of registries to inform quality improvement, population decision support, and efforts to reduce treatment abandonment.MethodsWe used a modified implementation mapping approach to optimize Ethiopia's pediatric hospital-based cancer registry across five pediatric cancer centers. Clinicians, data clerks, social workers, and implementation scientists jointly refined registry workflows and co-developed the Pediatric Oncology Summary Sheet-Treatment and Follow-up (POSSh-TF), a structured tool designed to capture treatment delivery, modifications, and longitudinal follow-up data beyond minimum WHO-IARC recommendations. Iterative workflow analyses were conducted to align documentation, data entry, and reporting processes with routine clinical care and priorities outlined in Ethiopia's National Cancer Control Plan.ResultsWe identified the following key gaps to registry implementation including (1) variability across sites in available resources, (2) workload barriers preventing completion at every patient visit, and (3) variability in proposed workflow options across institutions. In order to mitigate these barriers, we designed concrete implementation strategies including: (1) partnership with the non-profit organization The Aslan Project to support the initiative, (2) standardized pre-defined workflows and SOPs to facilitate longitudinal data capture, and (3) site-embedded registry personnel with targeted training to improve data collection.ConclusionsCollaborative optimization of pediatric oncology registries can extend their function beyond surveillance to support cancer control, quality monitoring, and patient-centered follow-up. The POSSh-TF and associated workflows provide a scalable model for leveraging registry data to strengthen continuity of care and population-level decision support in resource-constrained settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.