ArticleClinical endoscopy2026
Utility of endoscopic ultrasonography elastography as a predictive tool for post-treatment recurrence of resectable pancreatic cancer treated with neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy: a retrospective study in Japan.
Article in Clinical endoscopy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPost-treatment recurrence frequently occurs even in patients with resectable pancreatic cancer (PC) who receive neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC), surgery, and adjuvant chemotherapy (AC). This study aimed to evaluate whether endoscopic ultrasonography elastography (EUS-EG) of PC lesions is useful in predicting post-treatment recurrence in such patients.
methodsWe retrospectively analyzed 44 of 164 consecutive patients with resectable PC who underwent NAC, surgery, and AC after EUS-EG. The endpoints were associations between EUS-EG stiffness classification (soft/stiff) and pathological response, post-treatment recurrence, and recurrence-free survival (RFS).
resultsIn the soft vs. stiff groups, the median pathological response rate was 30% (20%-75%) vs. 20% (10%-65%) (p=0.022), post-treatment recurrence rate was 25% vs. 59% (p=0.042), and the median RFS was NR (not reached) days vs. 683 days (p=0.039). In the multivariate analysis, stiffness classification was the only factor significantly associated with RFS (hazard ratio, 4.2; p=0.025).
conclusionsTo the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to indicate that EUS-EG stiffness classification may predict recurrence in resectable PC treated with NAC, surgery, and AC. Patients with stiff lesions on EUS-EG tend to have a higher risk of recurrence and may require more careful post-treatment follow-up and novel treatment strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.