ArticleBiology open2026
Impacts of early-life thermal challenge on development, survival, and physiology in wild great tits.
Article in Biology open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Rapid climate change is increasing thermal extremes that may challenge developing endotherms. In altricial birds, early postnatal life is a sensitive period because thermoregulatory and physiological systems are still maturing. We experimentally manipulated nest temperature in a wild population of great tit to test whether mild, ecologically realistic heat (+2.3°C) and cold (-1.3°C) challenges affected development and physiology. Treatments were applied from days 2-8 post-hatching, and we measured growth, survival, hydration status (plasma osmolarity and uric acid), mitochondrial density, and immunoglobulin levels. Contrary to our predictions, thermal manipulation had no detectable effects on survival, morphology, or physiological traits at either day 8 or day 14. In contrast, all physiological markers varied significantly with age, reflecting normal osmoregulatory, metabolic, and immune development. These findings suggest that moderate, short-term thermal deviations during early development fall within the tolerance range of this population, or that parental behaviour buffered nestlings against temperature changes. However, stronger or prolonged extremes may exceed buffering capacity, and delayed effects cannot be excluded. Long-term studies are needed to assess latent fitness costs under increasingly variable climates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.