ReviewAnesthesia and pain medicine2026
Korean guidelines for pediatric procedural sedation.
Review in Anesthesia and pain medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Safe and effective pediatric sedation depends on multiple factors, including the precise selection of sedative agents, provider expertise, availability of age-appropriate monitoring equipment, and the patients' individual circumstances. These revised clinical practice guidelines, developed by the Korean Society of Pediatric Anesthesiologists, aim to promote safe and effective pediatric sedation across diverse clinical settings in Korea, thereby enhancing patient safety and standardizing care. These guidelines represent a comprehensive update to the first edition published in 2017, systematically revised through an expert consensus model to reflect the rapidly evolving clinical landscape. The revision prioritized clinical utility and consistency, incorporating the latest pharmacological and technological advancements, while optimizing the content for practical bedside use. Key recommendations cover the entire sedation continuum, including the identification of qualified providers, pre-sedation patient evaluation and fasting requirements, age-specific risk assessment, monitoring of the respiratory and cardiovascular systems, level of sedation, management of respiratory complications, and structured discharge criteria. These recommendations are intended to guide healthcare providers and guardians in sedation-related decision-making for various diagnostic and therapeutic procedures. Depending on the clinical needs and institutional limitations of the primary, secondary, and tertiary care facilities, sedation providers may apply these recommendations directly, adapt them to their specific environments, or use them as a foundational framework for internal protocols.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.