ArticleRisk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis2026
Mapping Human-AI Teaming in Risk Analysis: Role Evolution, Thematic Landscape, and Governance Mechanisms From News Media.
Article in Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Human-artificial intelligence (AI) teams are increasingly embedded in risk analysis, yet news reports repeatedly portray meaningful oversight as fragile when review conditions are poorly designed. This study examines how public discourse has portrayed the roles, failure modes, and governance mechanisms of human-AI teaming in risk analysis. Drawing on 184,282 AI-related Factiva news articles (1956-2025), we use a funnel-shaped mixed-methods design to identify 3571 articles describing human-AI interaction in risk-analytic contexts. Structural topic modeling identifies 20 thematic clusters and their temporal and cross-domain dynamics, whereas LLM-assisted inductive thematic analysis produces five mirror-mapped pairs of failure modes and governance mechanisms: opacity and explainability, bias and auditing, agency erosion and cognitive friction, systemic fragility and oversight and liability, and accountability vacuums and institutional governance. The analysis shows that media discourse often follows an AI-predicts-human-decides paradigm and portrays formal human-in-the-loop requirements as insufficient without deliberate interaction design.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.