ReviewAlzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association2026
Further data to address the Alzheimer's coverage with evidence development questions.
Review in Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind, Parallel-Group, 18-Month Study With an Open-Label Extension Phase to Confirm Safety and Efficacy of BAN2401 in Subjects With Early Alzheimer's Disease
Assessment of Safety, Tolerability, and Efficacy of Donanemab in Early Symptomatic Alzheimer's Disease
Investigating the Effect of Different Donanemab Dosing Regimens on ARIA-E and Amyloid Lowering in Adults With Early Symptomatic Alzheimer's Disease
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionMedicare patients currently access amyloid-targeting therapies for Alzheimer's disease through the class-based National Coverage Determination (NCD) with coverage with evidence development (CED) established in 2022. Evidence addressing the stated CED questions was previously published in a 2024 review; however, the original 2022 NCD remains unchanged.
methodsUpdate the previously published review responding to the CED questions by summarizing recently published donanemab and lecanemab extension data and new safety-related data.
resultsNew evidence addresses each of the three CED questions. Extension data show that the benefit of amyloid-targeting therapy continues to accrue with no new safety signals observed. Safety analyses identified baseline risk factors for amyloid-related imaging abnormalities (ARIA). Further, a more gradual donanemab titration regimen decreased risk of ARIA-edema/effusions. DISCUSSION: With CED questions addressed, reconsideration of the class-based NCD is scientifically justified. CLINICAL
trial registrationNCT04437511, NCT05738486, NCT03887455.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.