ArticleAmerican journal of botany2026
Seasonal variation in wind speed and oceanic salt spray favors delayed reproduction in coastal yellow monkeyflowers.
Article in American journal of botany, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Seasonal variation in wind speed and oceanic salt spray favors delayed reproduction in coastal yellow monkeyflowers.American journal of botany · 2026Article
- Foliar salt spray exclusion and tissue tolerance underlie local adaptation to oceanic salt spray.American journal of botany · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
premiseThe optimal timing of reproduction depends on the relative risk and benefit of continued growth. These risks and benefits depend on the local environment, which varies seasonally. While temperature and water availability are well-studied selective agents on reproductive timing, less is known about other seasonally variable factors.
methodsTo test whether seasonal variation in wind and salt spray influences selection on reproductive timing, we manipulated flowering time and ocean exposure in a coastal environment. Flowering plants from 12 yellow monkeyflower populations that span a coastal-to-inland gradient were placed on a coastal bluff in spring and summer. Inland populations typically flower in spring, which is much windier than the summer months when coastal populations usually flower, other plants were protected from wind and salt spray, and the rest were exposed to wind and salt spray.
resultsIn the windier spring cohort, individuals exposed to the ocean had severe necrosis and produced few flowers and seeds, while protected plants had little to no necrosis, producing more flowers and seeds than ocean-exposed plants. In the calmer summer cohort, individuals exposed to the ocean had less severe necrosis and produced comparable numbers of flowers as plants protected from the ocean. However, only coastal populations produced appreciable numbers of seeds when exposed to the ocean, consistent with prior evidence that coastal ecotypes are locally adapted.
conclusionsOverall, these results suggest that seasonal variation in wind and salt spray is a key selective factor in coastal populations contributing to population differences in flowering time.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.