Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42552689›Full record

ReviewJournal of the peripheral nervous system : JPNS2026

Clinical Development of Therapies for Charcot-Marie-Tooth Disease: Recommendations for Trial Design, Endpoints, and Regulatory Pathways.

Charles K Abrams, Sue Bruhn, Joshua Burns, Rebekah Fleming, Katherine Forsey, Vera Fridman, David N Herrmann, Brian Lin, Susan McCune, Allison Moore and 4 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of the peripheral nervous system : JPNS, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Charles K AbramsDepartment of Neurology and Rehabilitation, Chicago College of Medicine, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1272-9320
Sue BruhnCharcot-Marie-Tooth Association, Glenolden, Pennsylvania, USA.
Joshua BurnsDepartment of Epidemiology and Cancer Control, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7936-623X
Rebekah FlemingIndependent Researcher, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Katherine ForseyCharcot-Marie-Tooth Association, Glenolden, Pennsylvania, USA.
Vera FridmanDepartment of Neurology, Univesity of Colorado Denver School of Medicine, Denver, Colorado, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0068-8549
David N HerrmannDepartment of Neurology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York, USA.
Brian LinMuscular Dystrophy Association, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Susan McCuneScendea Ltd., Potomac, Maryland, USA.
Allison MooreHereditary Neuropathy Foundation, Midlothian, Virginia, USA.
Susan RuedigerCMT Research Foundation, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Michael ShyDepartment of Neurology, Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8460-6971
Shannon StromIndependent Researcher, Durham, North Carolina, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-2305-0604
ToPIC:CMT Steering Committee

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease (CMT) encompasses a heterogeneous group of inherited peripheral neuropathies. Despite being the most common genetic neurological condition, individual CMT subtypes are rare, presenting unique challenges for therapeutic development. The Together Patients Industry Clinicians versus CMT (ToPIC: CMT) Advocacy Group was formed with a diverse group of patient advocacy groups, clinician-scientists who treat patients with CMT, and pharmaceutical industry representatives to develop a common guidance on development of new treatments for CMT with clear expectations for meaningful patient outcomes and objective assessments of improvement. The ToPIC: CMT Group developed recommendations for clinical development of drugs and biological products for treating CMT, addressing trial design considerations for this rare progressive disease. Key challenges in CMT include small patient populations, variable disease progression, and the need for sensitive outcome measures. Recommendations emphasize flexible trial designs including adaptive designs, external controls, and single-participant designs when scientifically justified. Where possible, broad inclusion criteria based on clinical phenotype rather than genetic subtype alone are recommended. Disease-specific, validated outcome measures should assess function across ages and disease stages. Biomarkers reflecting peripheral nervous system health may serve as surrogate endpoints to support accelerated approval pathways. Patient and care partner perspectives are essential throughout development, particularly regarding treatment goals, risk tolerance, and meaningful endpoints. Successful therapeutic development for CMT and related neuropathies requires innovative approaches that balance rigorous scientific standards with the realities of rare disease research. Regulatory flexibility, informed by patient input and natural history data, can facilitate efficient development while maintaining assurance of safety and effectiveness.

Indexed as

Charcot-Marie-Tooth DiseaseClinical Trials as TopicDrug DevelopmentResearch DesignHumansCharcot–Marie–tooth diseaseclinical trialsdrug developmentinherited neuropathyperipheral neuropathyregulatory agency

Identifiers

PMID42552689
PMCPMC13438117

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.