Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42552587›Full record

ArticleG3 (Bethesda, Md.)2026

Annotated genome assemblies of two temperate North American dung beetles, Canthon chalcites and Phanaeus vindex.

Gwendolyn F Stark, Karin R L van der Burg, Alexander J Coverley, Katie E Marshall, Kimberly S Sheldon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in G3 (Bethesda, Md.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Gwendolyn F StarkDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996, United States.
Karin R L van der BurgDepartment of Biological Sciences, Clemson University, Clemson, SC 29631, United States.
Alexander J CoverleyDepartment of Zoology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Bc, Canada V6T 1Z4.
Katie E MarshallDepartment of Zoology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Bc, Canada V6T 1Z4.
Kimberly S SheldonDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-3215-2223

Funding

US National Science Foundation Integrative Organismal Systems 1930829
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dung beetles serve as cultivators of their natural habitats, improving soil health and functions in both natural and anthropogenic environments. Despite their ecological importance, whole genome sequences for Scarabaeinae are limited. Here, we present the draft annotated genome assemblies for 2 temperate species of North American dung beetles collected from eastern Tennessee: Canthon chalcites and Phanaeus vindex. Both genome assemblies were generated from PacBio long reads and have high completeness, with BUSCO scores of 98.1% and 98.6% for C. chalcites and P. vindex, respectively. For C. chalcites, the BRAKER3 pipeline predicted 12,799 genes, and the gene set was 93.7% complete. For P. vindex, the BRAKER3 predicted 12,252 genes, and the gene set was 94.9% complete. From the annotated gene sets, orthologous protein sequence analyses among C. chalcites, P. vindex, the dung beetle species Onthophagus taurus, and the more evolutionarily distant beetle Tribolium castaneum indicated that there are 260 unique protein clusters for C. chalcites and 210 unique protein clusters for P. vindex. These 2 draft genomes provide valuable data for comparative genomics, evolution, and phylogenic studies for dung beetle species.

Indexed as

ColeopteraGenome, InsectGenomicsMolecular Sequence AnnotationAnimalsPhylogenydung beetlegenome annotationgenome assemblytemperate

Identifiers

PMID42552587
PMCPMC13535367

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.