ReviewTropical medicine and health2026
Advanced statistical approaches in tuberculosis diagnosis and treatment outcomes in Africa: a systematic review.
Review in Tropical medicine and health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTuberculosis (TB) remains a major public health challenge in Africa; however, conventional statistical approaches often fail to capture diagnostic uncertainty, spatial heterogeneity, and complex disease dynamics, limiting evidence-based decision-making. This review synthesizes the application and performance of advanced statistical and computational methods for TB diagnosis and treatment outcomes in Africa.
methodsFollowing the PRISMA 2020 guidelines, we systematically searched PubMed and Scopus for peer-reviewed studies (2010-2025) conducted in Africa that applied advanced methods, including Bayesian models, machine learning (ML) algorithms, spatiotemporal analyses, time-series models, and multistate or survival frameworks. Study selection, data extraction, and quality appraisal were independently conducted by multiple reviewers using the Joanna Briggs Institute tools. Findings were synthesized narratively because of substantial methodological heterogeneity.
resultsTwenty-seven studies from nine African countries were included. Bayesian hierarchical, geostatistical, and latent class models improved estimation of TB incidence, mortality, and diagnostic accuracy by accounting for uncertainty, imperfect reference standards, and sparse data. Spatiotemporal analyses consistently identified geographic TB and TB-HIV hotspots linked to low Bacillus Calmette-Guérin vaccine coverage, illiteracy, and urban crowding as risk factors. Time-series models quantified the significant decline in TB notifications during the COVID-19 disruptions. ML approaches, particularly random forests, outperformed traditional regression in predicting latent TB infection and treatment outcomes. Drug resistance, notably to bedaquiline and levofloxacin, showed clear spatial clustering and dynamic progression patterns.
conclusionsAdvanced statistical and computational methods are increasingly improving TB diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment insights in Africa by capturing complex patterns beyond classical models, but their broader impact is limited by data gaps, heterogeneity, and insufficient validation, highlighting the need for high-quality, multi-country research and stronger implementation frameworks. PROSPERO ID: CRD420251160248.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.