Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42552535›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2026

Untangling standardization and administrative burden as microfoundations of agility in healthcare.

Pierre-Luc Fournier, Mira Thoumy, Patrick Groulx, Desirée H van Dun, Kevin J Johnson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Pierre-Luc FournierUniversité de Sherbrooke, École de gestion Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Canada.
Mira ThoumyLebanese American University, Adnan Kassar School of Business Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon. Mira.thoumy@lau.edu.lb.
Patrick GroulxUniversité du Québec à Montréal, École des sciences de la gestion Montréal, Montréal, Canada.
Desirée H van DunPolitecnico di Milano, Department of Management, Economics and Industrial Engineering, Milan, Italy.
Kevin J JohnsonHEC Montréal, Department of Management Montréal, Montréal, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe capability of healthcare organizations to provide high-quality care is in part determined by their workers' ability to adapt to a complex and uncertain environment. Since healthcare operations are often highly standardized and bureaucratized, adapting and responding to internal and external changes is no small feat. This study investigates these tensions as determinants of individual agility.

methodsUsing survey data collected from 2,173 Canadian nurses along with structural equation modelling, the study assesses a hypothetical model to understand how process standardization and administrative burden influence individual agility and, in turn, the quality of care provided to patients.

resultsThe results show that the quality of care provided by nurses to their patients is increased by their internal and external individual agility. These, in turn, are positively influenced by process standardization but inhibited by administrative burden.

conclusionThis study extends current literature on the microfoundations of agility in healthcare by providing theoretical and practical contributions on the impact of enabling and coercive bureaucracy.

Indexed as

Quality of Health CareCanadaHumansSurveys and QuestionnairesAdministrative burdenHealthcareIndividual agilityProcess standardization

Identifiers

PMID42552535
PMCPMC13439997

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.