ArticleBMC health services research2026
Why condition cash transfers? A multimethod pilot study evaluating the conditioning of cash transfers for tuberculosis treatment.
Article in BMC health services research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTuberculosis (TB) is the archetypal disease of poverty, driven by social determinants and causing catastrophic costs. A 2023 United Nations General Assembly resolution called for all TB-affected people to receive a social benefits package by 2027. Cash transfers have been shown to improve health outcomes; however, operational evidence on their implementation and effectiveness in reducing catastrophic costs due to TB is limited. This pilot study sought to assess the feasibility of delivering cash transfers to people affected by drug-susceptible TB to inform the design of a future trial.
methodsA longitudinal, non-randomized cohort study was conducted in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam. Half of the participants received unconditional cash transfers (UCTs) while the other half received conditional cash transfers (CCTs) after monthly appointment attendance and completion of 85% of scheduled doses. We analyzed pilot data to assess rates of participant enrollment, adherence and retention in the intervention, TB treatment success, and catastrophic cost incurrence. A 22-day time and motion study quantified the distribution of time pilot staff spent administering the cash transfer intervention by cohort.
resultsDelivering cash transfers was feasible, with 60/70 (85.7%) and 60/66 (90.9%) of eligible individuals in the CCT and UCT cohorts agreeing to participate, respectively. Only 12.3% of CCT participants had one or more transfers withheld and 5.8% of the total expected CCTs were withheld. Delivering CCTs in the observation period took twice as much time as UCTs (32.4 hours for 43 CCT participants vs. 16.0 hours for 47 UCT participants). There were no significant differences in TB treatment success rates between the cohorts (91.7% CCT vs. 93.3% UCT). Cash transfers caused catastrophic cost incurrence to decline by 12.9% in the CCT cohort (44.2% to 38.5%) and 26.9% in the UCT cohort (26.8% to 19.6%).
conclusionsCash transfers are a feasible way to mitigate the economic burden of TB in Vietnam. The conditionality assessed was not associated with any quantifiable benefits to TB-affected people, and required more effort to implement. A larger trial utilizing similar methods and outcomes is warranted. Our findings inform the design of a slightly modified approach of cash transfer delivery for the larger trial.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.