Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42552524›Full record

ArticleBMC psychiatry2026

Suicide prevention through a SafetyPlan intervention for patients after a suicide attempt or in a suicidal crisis (SAFETY+): a study protocol of a randomised-controlled trial in acute inpatient psychiatric care.

Mariam Yunusah, Lena Marie Hensel, Tobias Teismann, Peter Brieger, Hermann Spießl, Yekaterina Pashutina, Sarah Sophia Michna, Chiara Spielmann, Marlene Stadler, Johanna Freund and 3 more

Abstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMC psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Mariam YunusahBezirksklinikum Mainkofen, Medizincampus Niederbayern, Mainkofen A 3, 94469, Deggendorf, Germany. m.yunusah@mainkofen.de.
Lena Marie HenselForschungs- und Behandlungszentrum für psychische Gesundheit, Ruhr- Universität Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
Tobias TeismannForschungs- und Behandlungszentrum für psychische Gesundheit, Ruhr- Universität Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
Peter Briegerkbo Isar-Amper-Klinikum Region München, München, Germany.
Hermann SpießlBezirkskrankenhaus Landshut, Landshut, Germany.
Yekaterina Pashutinakbo Isar-Amper-Klinikum Region München, München, Germany.
Sarah Sophia Michnakbo Isar-Amper-Klinikum Region München, München, Germany.
Chiara SpielmannBezirkskrankenhaus Landshut, Landshut, Germany.
Marlene StadlerBezirksklinikum Mainkofen, Medizincampus Niederbayern, Mainkofen A 3, 94469, Deggendorf, Germany.
Johanna FreundBezirksklinikum Mainkofen, Medizincampus Niederbayern, Mainkofen A 3, 94469, Deggendorf, Germany.
Susanne Menzelkbo Isar-Amper-Klinikum Region München, München, Germany.
Chaimae El HammadiBezirksklinikum Mainkofen, Medizincampus Niederbayern, Mainkofen A 3, 94469, Deggendorf, Germany.
Johannes HamannBezirksklinikum Mainkofen, Medizincampus Niederbayern, Mainkofen A 3, 94469, Deggendorf, Germany.

Funding

Innovation Fund of the German Federal Joint Committee 01VSF23013
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIndividuals undergoing acute inpatient psychiatric treatment or who have recently been discharged face an especially elevated risk of suicide. Nevertheless, suicide-specific interventions are still not routinely implemented in inpatient psychiatric care in Germany. Safety plan interventions (SPIs), which involve developing individualised safety plans, have been shown to be highly effective in reducing the number of suicide attempts. Due to their simplicity and low resource requirements, they may be suitable for broad implementation. However, there is currently a lack of evidence regarding their effectiveness in inpatient psychiatric settings in Germany. This study addresses this critical research gap by investigating whether the SAFETY+ intervention can reduce suicide attempts within twelve months of discharge from a German inpatient psychiatric setting compared to usual care. Additionally, the research project will focus on the implementation of the intervention.

methodThis mixed-methods study combines a randomised controlled trial (RCT) with qualitative interviews of participants and professionals involved in treatment and study implementation. In the RCT, 450 patients with acute suicidality will be recruited from three large psychiatric clinics in Bavaria. Participants will be randomly assigned to either the SafetyPlan group (n = 225) or the treatment-as-usual group (n = 225). The intervention includes a manualised SafetyPlan intervention (SPI) session during hospitalisation and telephone follow-up sessions one and four weeks after discharge. Data will be collected at five time points: after consenting to participate (T0a) and shortly before discharge (T0b), as well as at follow-ups six weeks (T1), six months (T2) and twelve months (T3) after discharge. DISCUSSION: The findings of this study can be transferred directly into standard psychiatric practice since the study is embedded in routine clinical care. The study encompasses both urban areas (Munich) and rural areas with limited outpatient resources (e.g., the Bavarian Forest region, a rural area in Eastern Bavaria), thereby enhancing the generalisability of the results to other psychiatric care settings with similar structures across Germany. Should the procedure prove effective, the findings may promote future nationwide implementation efforts.

trial registrationThis trial is registered with the German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS), ID: DRKS00037168, registered on 07 July 2025. URL: https://www.drks.de/DRKS00037168 .

Indexed as

Suicide, AttemptedSuicide PreventionCrisis InterventionGermanyHumansInpatientsPatient DischargeRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicPsychiatric careSafety planningSuicidal crisisSuicidal crisis interventionSuicide attemptSuicide prevention

Identifiers

PMID42552524
PMCPMC13435703

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.