Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42552518›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of emergency medicine2026

Daily, weekly, and monthly dynamics of crowding in emergency department of university clinical centre Serbia: a one-year analysis of NEDOCS score.

Slobodan Dzelebdzic, Bosiljka Djikanovic, Zoran Bukumiric, Natasa Maksimovic, Dusan Micic, Zorana Ana Rakočević, Vasa Curcin, Aleksandar Medarevic

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of emergency medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Slobodan DzelebdzicThe Emergency Center, University Clinical Center of Serbia, Dr Subotica 8, Belgrade, 11000, Serbia. slobodan976@yahoo.com.
Bosiljka DjikanovicInstitute of Social Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia.
Zoran BukumiricInstitute of Statistics and Medical Informatics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia.
Natasa MaksimovicInstitute of Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia.
Dusan MicicThe Emergency Center, University Clinical Center of Serbia, Dr Subotica 8, Belgrade, 11000, Serbia.
Zorana Ana RakočevićInstitute of Social Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia.
Vasa CurcinDepartment of Population Health Sciences, King's College London, London, SE1 1UL, UK. vasa.curcin@kcl.ac.uk.
Aleksandar MedarevicInstitute of Public Health of Serbia "Dr Milan Jovanovic Batut", Belgrade, Serbia.

Funding

EPSRC-funded King's Health Partners Digital Health Hub EP/X030628/1the Ministry of Science, Technological Development and Innovation Republic of Serbia 451-03-66/2024-03/200110
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEmergency department (ED) crowding is increasingly recognized as a global public health issue, while evidences from South-East Europe remain limited. The aim of this study was to characterize daily, annual, weekly, and monthly patterns of ED crowding in a high-volume tertiary hospital.

methodsWe conducted a retrospective observational study of ED crowding in the largest ED in Serbia over 360 consecutive days (8,640 one-hour intervals). Crowding was measured hourly using the National Emergency Department Overcrowding Score (NEDOCS), derived from routinely collected data from health information system and expressed on a 0-200 scale, later grouped into six standard categories. Descriptive analyses assessed annual distribution, circadian and weekly variation, seasonal trends, and patient age structure. Between-group differences in NEDOCS scores were assessed using the Kruskal-Wallis test. Effect sizes were estimated using eta-squared (η²).

resultsThe majority of patients in ED (43.14%) were older than 60. Almost 90% of patients (89.5%) waited up to 4 h for the first check up by doctor. The median annual NEDOCS score was 43.87 (IQR 51.92 ), corresponding to a "busy" operational state. Level 2 ("busy") occurred in 39.4% of hourly intervals and level 1 ("not busy") in 29.5%, while overcrowding (levels 4-6) was observed in 5.6% of intervals. Crowding was significantly higher during daytime than nighttime hours (p < 0.001), with a pronounced morning peak. Weekday crowding exceeded weekend levels, peaking on Tuesdays. Seasonal variation showed higher crowding during winter and transitional months.

conclusionsED crowding demonstrates predictable temporal patterns that mirror broader population health dynamics. Routine high-frequency monitoring may inform strategic staffing, adaptive capacity planning, and governance mechanisms aimed at strengthening emergency care performance and system resilience.

Indexed as

CrowdingEmergency departmentHealth information systemsHealth services researchNEDOCSOperational managementTemporal patterns

Identifiers

PMID42552518
PMCPMC13435447

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.