Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42552477›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2026

Machine learning-based screening tool for predicting the risk of oropharyngeal dysphagia in patients with ischemic stroke.

Suzanne Bettega Almeida, Bianca Marques de Mattos de Araujo, Maria Cristina de Alencar Nunes, Luana Beatriz das Portas Luiz, Rayane Délcia da Silva, Bianca Simone Zeigelboim, Karinna Veríssimo Meira Taveira, Elisa Souza Camargo, Rosane Sampaio Santos, Cristiano Miranda de Araujo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Suzanne Bettega AlmeidaHuman Communication Health, Center for Artificial Intelligence in Health (NIAS), Tuiuti University of Paraná, Curitiba, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0826-8787
Bianca Marques de Mattos de AraujoSchool of Dentistry, Department of Endodontics, Center for Artificial Intelligence in Health (NIAS), Tuiuti University of Paraná, Street Sydnei Antonio Rangel Santos, 238 - Santo Inacio, Curitiba, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7507-4667
Maria Cristina de Alencar NunesCenter for Artificial Intelligence in Health (NIAS), Federal University of Paraná Hospital Complex - CHC-UFPR - EBSERH, Curitiba, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5882-7527
Luana Beatriz das Portas LuizSchool of Dentistry, Tuiuti University of Paraná, Curitiba, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-3252-2187
Rayane Délcia da SilvaHuman Communication Health, Center for Artificial Intelligence in Health (NIAS), Tuiuti University of Paraná, Curitiba, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1935-6448
Bianca Simone ZeigelboimHuman Communication Health, Center for Artificial Intelligence in Health (NIAS), Tuiuti University of Paraná, Curitiba, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4871-2683
Karinna Veríssimo Meira TaveiraSpeech, Language and Hearing Sciences, Center for Artificial Intelligence in Health (NIAS), Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6978-4083
Elisa Souza CamargoPontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná, Curitiba, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7382-1526
Rosane Sampaio SantosHuman Communication Health, Center for Artificial Intelligence in Health (NIAS), Tuiuti University of Paraná, Curitiba, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6400-5706
Cristiano Miranda de AraujoHuman Communication Health, Center for Artificial Intelligence in Health (NIAS), Tuiuti University of Paraná, Curitiba, Brazil. cristiano.m.araujo@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1325-4248

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeDysphagia frequently complicates recovery after stroke, necessitating effective predictive tools. This study aimed to develop supervised machine learning models to predict dysphagia risk in ischemic stroke patients.

methodWe retrospectively analyzed data from 103 ischemic stroke patients, aged over 18 years, using fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES) as the diagnostic standard for dysphagia. Clinical variables included age, sex, EAT-10 score, Functional Oral Intake Scale (FOIS

resultsPredictive models effectively distinguished dysphagia cases. Gradient Boosting and CatBoost achieved the highest AUC values (AUC = 0.99) on the test set. Logistic Regression performed consistently across test and cross-validation sets, achieving an AUC of 0.95 [95% CI: 0.86-1.00] and precision of 0.91 [95% CI: 0.80-1.00] in the test set, and high values in cross-validation (AUC = 0.93 [95% CI: 0.84-1.00]; precision = 0.92 [95% CI: 0.81-0.99]). Key predictors were FOIS

conclusionMachine Learning models showed promise for dysphagia screening post-stroke, with Gradient Boosting, CatBoost, and Logistic Regression showing strong clinical potential for decision support and early referral.

Indexed as

Deglutition DisordersIschemic StrokeMachine LearningStrokeAgedBoosting Machine Learning AlgorithmsClassification AlgorithmsFemaleHumansLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedPrediction AlgorithmsPredictive Learning ModelsRandom ForestRetrospective StudiesDysphagiaIschemic strokeMachine learningScreening

Identifiers

PMID42552477
PMCPMC13614996

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.