ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2026
Machine learning-based screening tool for predicting the risk of oropharyngeal dysphagia in patients with ischemic stroke.
Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeDysphagia frequently complicates recovery after stroke, necessitating effective predictive tools. This study aimed to develop supervised machine learning models to predict dysphagia risk in ischemic stroke patients.
methodWe retrospectively analyzed data from 103 ischemic stroke patients, aged over 18 years, using fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES) as the diagnostic standard for dysphagia. Clinical variables included age, sex, EAT-10 score, Functional Oral Intake Scale (FOIS
resultsPredictive models effectively distinguished dysphagia cases. Gradient Boosting and CatBoost achieved the highest AUC values (AUC = 0.99) on the test set. Logistic Regression performed consistently across test and cross-validation sets, achieving an AUC of 0.95 [95% CI: 0.86-1.00] and precision of 0.91 [95% CI: 0.80-1.00] in the test set, and high values in cross-validation (AUC = 0.93 [95% CI: 0.84-1.00]; precision = 0.92 [95% CI: 0.81-0.99]). Key predictors were FOIS
conclusionMachine Learning models showed promise for dysphagia screening post-stroke, with Gradient Boosting, CatBoost, and Logistic Regression showing strong clinical potential for decision support and early referral.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.