Trial reportEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2026
Glossopharyngeal nerve block versus tonsillar fossa ropivacaine infiltration within multimodal analgesia for pediatric post-tonsillectomy pain: a randomized controlled clinical trial.
Trial report in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposePediatric tonsillectomy is associated with substantial postoperative pain. We compared glossopharyngeal nerve block (GNB) with peritonsillar ropivacaine infiltration (RI) within multimodal analgesia.
methodsIn this double-blind randomized trial, 90 children (4-10 years) undergoing day-case tonsillectomy were randomly allocated in a 1:1:1 ratio (30 per group) to receive bilateral GNB with 0.2% ropivacaine, RI with 0.2% ropivacaine, or sham control. The primary outcome was post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) pain measured by the Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability (FLACC) scale; secondary outcomes included pain at rest and during swallowing measured by the Wong-Baker FACES Pain Rating Scale (FACES) at rest and during swallowing (2-24 h), time to first analgesic request, nausea, sleep quality, parental satisfaction, and adverse events.
resultsTime to first analgesic request was significantly longer in the GNB group than in the control group (median 240 vs. 120 min; P < 0.001). Pain at rest was lower with GNB than control from 2 to 12 h and lower than RI at 6 h, and swallowing pain was lower with GNB than both comparators from 2 to 24 h (all P ≤ 0.008) . Nausea was less frequent with GNB (6.7%) than RI (20%) or control (33.3%) (P = 0.036), and sleep quality and parental satisfaction were higher with GNB (P = 0.010 and P < 0.001). PACU FLACC and sedation scores were similar, and no serious anesthetic-related arrhythmias or bronchospasm were observed.
conclusionsWithin the studied multimodal analgesic regimen, bilateral GNB with 0.2% ropivacaine was associated with lower postoperative pain scores, improved swallowing comfort, longer time to first rescue analgesia, and better caregiver-reported outcomes in this randomized cohort, without increased sedation or observed major anesthetic-related complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42552476What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.