Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42552417›Full record

SynthesisMolecular psychiatry2026

Common and disorder-specific aberrant activation during reward and loss processing in major depressive disorder and addiction: a meta-analysis of fMRI studies.

Xiaoqin Yang, Yuchen Huang, Wangyue Liu, Taoyu Wu, Zhen Liu, Shumin Gao, Qihong Zheng, Ziyue Dou, Junwei Zheng, Shiqiu Meng and 4 more

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Molecular psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Xiaoqin YangNational Institute on Drug Dependence and Beijing Key Laboratory of Innovative Intervention Techniques and Translational Research for Mental Disorders Rehabilitation, Peking University, 100191, Beijing, China.
Yuchen HuangNational Institute on Drug Dependence and Beijing Key Laboratory of Innovative Intervention Techniques and Translational Research for Mental Disorders Rehabilitation, Peking University, 100191, Beijing, China.
Wangyue LiuNational Institute on Drug Dependence and Beijing Key Laboratory of Innovative Intervention Techniques and Translational Research for Mental Disorders Rehabilitation, Peking University, 100191, Beijing, China.
Taoyu WuNational Institute on Drug Dependence and Beijing Key Laboratory of Innovative Intervention Techniques and Translational Research for Mental Disorders Rehabilitation, Peking University, 100191, Beijing, China.
Zhen LiuNational Institute on Drug Dependence and Beijing Key Laboratory of Innovative Intervention Techniques and Translational Research for Mental Disorders Rehabilitation, Peking University, 100191, Beijing, China.
Shumin GaoNational Institute on Drug Dependence and Beijing Key Laboratory of Innovative Intervention Techniques and Translational Research for Mental Disorders Rehabilitation, Peking University, 100191, Beijing, China.
Qihong ZhengNational Institute on Drug Dependence and Beijing Key Laboratory of Innovative Intervention Techniques and Translational Research for Mental Disorders Rehabilitation, Peking University, 100191, Beijing, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-5778-0674
Ziyue DouNational Institute on Drug Dependence and Beijing Key Laboratory of Innovative Intervention Techniques and Translational Research for Mental Disorders Rehabilitation, Peking University, 100191, Beijing, China.
Junwei ZhengNational Institute on Drug Dependence and Beijing Key Laboratory of Innovative Intervention Techniques and Translational Research for Mental Disorders Rehabilitation, Peking University, 100191, Beijing, China.
Shiqiu MengNational Institute on Drug Dependence and Beijing Key Laboratory of Innovative Intervention Techniques and Translational Research for Mental Disorders Rehabilitation, Peking University, 100191, Beijing, China.
Lin LuNational Institute on Drug Dependence and Beijing Key Laboratory of Innovative Intervention Techniques and Translational Research for Mental Disorders Rehabilitation, Peking University, 100191, Beijing, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0742-9072
Yanping BaoNational Institute on Drug Dependence and Beijing Key Laboratory of Innovative Intervention Techniques and Translational Research for Mental Disorders Rehabilitation, Peking University, 100191, Beijing, China. baoyp@bjmu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1881-0939
Yan SunNational Institute on Drug Dependence and Beijing Key Laboratory of Innovative Intervention Techniques and Translational Research for Mental Disorders Rehabilitation, Peking University, 100191, Beijing, China. sunyan@bjmu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0443-6309
Jie ShiNational Institute on Drug Dependence and Beijing Key Laboratory of Innovative Intervention Techniques and Translational Research for Mental Disorders Rehabilitation, Peking University, 100191, Beijing, China. shijie@bjmu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6567-8160

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accumulating evidence has demonstrated that dysfunction in the brain reward circuit plays a pivotal role in the pathogenesis of both major depressive disorder (MDD) and addictive disorders (substance use and behavioral addictions). However, it remains unclear whether the neural dysfunctions during reward processing are shared or distinct between these disorders. To address this, we employed the Seed-based d Mapping (SDM) toolbox to explore shared and distinct task-based fMRI findings in MDD and addictive disorders during the processing of reward (anticipation and outcome) and loss (outcome). The electronic databases PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, Web of Science, and PsycINFO were searched from their inception until September 20, 2025. Studies were included if they used fMRI to compare brain responses during reward/loss tasks between patients (with MDD or addictive disorders) and healthy controls, and reported whole-brain coordinates (in Talairach or MNI space). The analysis included 76 articles, including 45 articles with 1212 addiction patients, 31 articles with 1211 MDD patients, and 2126 healthy controls aggregated from the 76 articles. Conjunction analysis revealed no significant common hypo- or hyper-activated brain regions between patients with addictive disorders and those with MDD (addiction & MDD) relative to healthy controls across all experimental conditions. Differential analysis showed addiction patients had greater left striatum activation (vs. MDD) during reward anticipation, and greater right putamen and left striatum activation (vs. MDD) during reward outcome. No significant differences were found under the loss outcome. Our findings indicate that during reward processing, the striatum is a common functionally abnormal brain region in both MDD and addictive disorders, but the activation directions of the two disorders in this region show opposite trends. The striatum can serve as a transdiagnostic common abnormal marker for MDD and addictive disorders. Our results provide potential targets for future research on neuromodulatory, pharmacological, and clinical interventions in patients with MDD alone, addictive disorders alone, and comorbid patients of the two disorders.

Identifiers

PMID42552417

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.