ReviewNature neuroscience2026
The compositionality continuum as a principle for studying the neural basis of intelligence.
Review in Nature neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Compositionality has long been regarded as a uniquely human capacity and a cornerstone of general intelligence. It is most clearly exemplified in natural language, where a finite set of words is combined through grammatical rules to generate an unbounded number of sentences. Recent advances across disciplines challenge the view that compositionality is exclusive to human cognition and question whether an explicit symbolic structure is required to implement it. Large language models, for example, achieve impressive compositional abilities through scale alone. Neuroscience has also revealed that animals use compositional neural codes when applying knowledge to novel situations, while theory and modeling are beginning to clarify how neural networks without explicit symbolic structures implement compositional computations. High-density neural recordings from animals performing compositional tasks, combined with reverse engineering of neural network models, now enable us to test fundamental questions, such as how biological brains implement compositional solutions and when compositional behavior can emerge from scale rather than from explicit compositional mechanisms. We propose that compositional mechanisms exist along a continuum defined by the expressivity of computation-specific building blocks and the complexity of systematic recombination rules. Comparing implementations across biological and artificial systems will determine whether general intelligence requires explicit compositionality or can emerge from scaled mechanisms alone.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42552385What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.