Articlenpj health systems2026
The mirrored burden and accountable handovers in cancer survivorship: co‑designing a post‑treatment transition standard.
Article in npj health systems, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Post-treatment transitions after active cancer care often lack clear ownership, timelines and closure rules, shifting coordination work onto survivors and staff. We aimed to identify how these failures arise and to co-design a handover standard for post-treatment survivorship care. In a two-stage qualitative study, Stage A involved semi-structured interviews with survivors and professionals (n = 65) across head and neck, colorectal and gastrointestinal stromal tumour pathways; Stage B comprised four co-design workshops (n = 21). We identified a mechanism we term mirrored burden, in which routine letters and electronic records fail to make responsibility explicit and both survivors and staff end up chasing care. Co-design produced a four-component handover standard centred on accountable correspondence, a clinically senior survivorship lead practitioner with delegated authority, clinic-based resolution capacity, and equity safeguards for non-digital access and communication needs, plus four equity-stratified audit-ready feasibility indicators for service-level evaluation.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.