SynthesisSpinal cord2026
Therapeutic local hypothermia in the management of acute spinal cord injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Spinal cord, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
STUDY
designSystematic Review.
objectivesTo evaluate the clinical safety and efficacy of local hypothermia in the management of acute spinal cord injury.
settingThe studies included in this review were conducted in Canada, the USA, and the UK.
methodsA comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science was conducted for studies up to December 2024, in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Our inclusion criteria encompassed human patients with ASCI treated with local hypothermia and reported neurological outcomes. A random-effects single-arm meta-analysis was used to calculate pooled neurological improvement rates.
resultsFive studies comprising 48 patients were included. The pooled proportion of patients who experienced neurological improvement following local hypothermia was 54.4% (95% CI: 39.9-68.2%) with no significant heterogeneity (I² = 0%). Subgroup analyses did not detect statistically significant differences in outcomes based on injury level (cervical vs thoracic), time to cooling (<8 vs ≥8 h), or cooling route (intradural vs extradural), although these analyses were likely underpowered. Reporting of complications was variable, with infections, decubitus ulcers, and respiratory complications being the most prevalent.
conclusionLocal hypothermia may represent a potential adjunctive neuroprotective strategy for acute spinal cord injury, with over half of patients demonstrating neurological improvement in this limited dataset. However, these findings are hypothesis-generating and should be interpreted with caution. Variability in study protocols and limited sample sizes preclude definitive conclusions. Larger, standardized clinical trials and improved methods of local delivery of hypothermia are warranted to validate its therapeutic potential and optimize treatment parameters.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42552353What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.