Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42552322›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Evaluation of different defect-inspection setups for injection molding parts based on the deep learning method.

Enrico Bovo, Xi Vincent Wang, Giovanni Lucchetta, Lihui Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Enrico BovoDepartment of Industrial Engineering, University of Padua, Via Venezia 1, Padua, 35131, Italy. enrico.bovo.1@unipd.it.
Xi Vincent WangDepartment of Production Engineering, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, 10044, Sweden. wangxi@kth.se.
Giovanni LucchettaDepartment of Industrial Engineering, University of Padua, Via Venezia 1, Padua, 35131, Italy.
Lihui WangDepartment of Production Engineering, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, 10044, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the injection molding industry, the shift toward small-batch production has led to a greater variety of products and smaller batch sizes, necessitating frequent mold changes and efficient quality control, which still largely relies on human operators. This study proposes a comprehensive methodology for evaluating and comparing deep learning-based automatic optical inspection (AOI) strategies to detect complex surface defects in injection-molded parts. Three inspection setups were assessed: static frontal imaging, belt conveyor inspection, and robotic-assisted inspection. The findings reveal clear differences in defect detection capabilities among the methods, with the robotic-assisted approach demonstrating superior performance, achieving higher defect detection accuracy due to its flexibility in optimizing camera angles and positions. The proposed methodology serves as a workflow to systematically evaluate and optimize inspection setups across different parameters, enabling informed decisions about AOI systems design. This research contributes to narrowing the gap between the development of advanced detection algorithms and their industrial application, offering insights into the strategic implementation of AI technologies in quality control processes and enhancing the automatic detection of challenging defects.

Indexed as

Automated Optical InspectionDeep LearningDefect DetectionInjection MoldingSurface Quality

Identifiers

PMID42552322
PMCPMC13438817

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.