ArticleScientific data2026
Data Management Workflow for FAIR Sharing of Bioimaging Datasets in Plasma Medicine.
Article in Scientific data, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Data Management Workflow for FAIR Sharing of Bioimaging Datasets in Plasma Medicine.Scientific data · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Bioimaging experiments in plasma medicine generate datasets that extend beyond conventional imaging studies by combining microscopy data with heterogeneous metadata from biological experiments and gas plasma treatments. These data are often distributed across multiple systems, making it difficult to maintain links between imaging data, plasma treatment conditions, biological metadata, and microscopy acquisition settings. This fragmentation limits data sharing and repository deposits. To address this challenge, we present a data management workflow for FAIR sharing of bioimaging datasets in plasma medicine. The workflow is implemented as an open-source Jupyter Notebook and connects the established research data management tools Open Microscopy Environment Remote Objects (OMERO) for image data management, eLabFTW as an electronic laboratory notebook for experimental documentation, Adamant as a schema-based metadata acquisition tool, and Micro-Meta App for the standardized capture of microscopy settings. The workflow guides researchers through the data management process, supporting the adoption of the FAIR data principles for the sharing and reuse of imaging datasets. We demonstrate how biological metadata, plasma-treatment parameters, microscopy settings, and image data are associated across the Screen, Plate, and Well hierarchy in OMERO through structured JSON metadata records generated in Adamant, stored in eLabFTW, and linked to imaging datasets. By means of a structured FAIR assessment, the contribution of the workflow components to the achievement of FAIR imaging datasets in plasma medicine is demonstrated, resulting in a FAIR compliance level of 50-60%. Thus, the Jupyter Notebook workflow supports researchers in plasma medicine and other domains with similar requirements by linking image data and metadata to experiment descriptions, enabling FAIR sharing and simplified reuse of bioimaging datasets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.