ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2026
The Triple Burden of Administrative Tasks Among US Family Medicine Physicians-A Cross-sectional Study.
Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAlthough interoperability advances and policy initiatives have expanded EHR functionality and were intended to streamline clinical workflows, many administrative tasks remain burdensome.
objectiveTo describe the prevalence and co-occurrence of three administrative burdens in family medicine and to assess associations of health information technology (health IT) and organizational resources with these burdens.
designCross-sectional study
participantsIn total, 8419 US family physicians completing American Board of Family Medicine certification requirements in 2024. MEASUREMENTS: Self-reported effort spent tracking down external health information and completing prior authorizations and time spent documenting clinical care outside regular office hours. Key independent variables included perceived EHR support for obtaining external information, ability to complete prior authorizations within the EHR, and use of documentation support tools including scribes, other staff, transcription tools, and EHR templates.
resultsRespondents were 46% female and 60% under age 50. More than three-quarters of physicians reported at least one substantial administrative burden, and 15% experienced substantial burden from all three activities. Satisfaction with EHR support for obtaining external information was associated with lower likelihood of substantial effort for that task (OR 0.47, P < 0.001), whereas ability to complete prior authorizations within the EHR was not associated with lower prior authorization burden. Use of staff support and EHR templates rated as helpful were associated with lower likelihood of substantial after-hours documentation (staff support OR 0.83, P < 0.001; templates OR 0.70, P < 0.001) and of experiencing the triple burden (templates OR 0.63, P < 0.001). LIMITATIONS: Cross-sectional, self-reported data from a single physician specialty may limit generalizability.
conclusionAdministrative burdens remain common in family medicine. Interoperability and documentation supports may mitigate some burdens, whereas prior authorization burden persists despite current electronic capabilities. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: US Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the National Coordinator for Health IT.
Identifiers
42552294What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.