ReviewCurrent pain and headache reports2026
Phenol Neurolysis for Refractory Non-Cancer Chronic Pain: Re-Evaluating an Established Technique in Modern Pain Practice.
Review in Current pain and headache reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewTo critically reevaluate the role of phenol neurolysis in the management of refractory chronic non-cancer pain, focusing on mechanisms of action, formulations, clinical indications, procedural techniques, therapeutic efficacy, safety profile, economic considerations, and its relevance in the era of modern interventional pain therapies. RECENT
findingsEmerging evidence suggests that phenol neurolysis may provide meaningful analgesia and functional improvement in selected patients with refractory non-cancer pain, including spasticity, trigeminal neuralgia, osteoarthritis, coccydynia, and sympathetically maintained pain. However, available studies remain limited, heterogeneous, and largely observational, with substantial variability in concentrations, indications, and techniques. The overall quality of evidence is predominantly low to moderate. Despite declining use in contemporary practice, phenol neurolysis remains a potentially valuable option in selected clinical scenarios, particularly in resource-constrained settings. Significant knowledge gaps and lack of procedural standardization underscore the need for high-quality prospective research to better define its role in modern pain management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42552280What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.