ArticleWiener klinische Wochenschrift2026
Perioperative anesthesia management for video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery procedures in Austria : A national survey.
Article in Wiener klinische Wochenschrift, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundVideo-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) is widely used for anatomical lung resections. Despite available enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) recommendations, perioperative management may vary between institutions. This survey assessed current perioperative practice for VATS procedures in Austria.
methodsA structured questionnaire comprising 19 items was distributed to all anesthesia departments performing thoracic surgery in Austria (n = 13) in February 2024. The survey addressed institutional characteristics, airway management, intraoperative anesthesia strategies, monitoring practices and perioperative analgesia. Data were analyzed descriptively.
resultsA total of 10 centers responded (response rate 76.7%) but 1 center did not perform VATS procedures and was excluded from the practice-based analysis; therefore, 9 centers performing VATS were analyzed. Annual VATS case volume ranged from 48-800 procedures. An established ERAS program was reported by three centers (33.3%), while implementation was planned in two centers (22.2%). Airway management varied, with direct laryngoscopy, video laryngoscopy and user-dependent intubation strategies reported. Conventional double-lumen tubes were used as the primary device in six centers (66.7%), whereas camera-assisted double-lumen tubes were used in three centers (33.3%). Routine invasive arterial monitoring was reported by six centers (66.7%) and immediate extubation in the operating room was routine in eight centers (88.9%). Regional anesthesia techniques varied considerably, whereas systemic analgesia was applied more consistently.
conclusionThis national survey demonstrates substantial intercenter variability in perioperative management of VATS procedures in Austria, particularly regarding ERAS implementation, airway management and regional analgesia strategies. The clinical impact of this variability remains unknown because patient outcomes were not assessed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42552277What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.