ArticleMolecular biomedicine2026
Integrative cfDNA profiling from low-pass whole-genome sequencing enables tissue-of-origin prediction in cancer.
Article in Molecular biomedicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cancer type classification is challenging due to tumor heterogeneity and undefined tissue of origin (TOO), particularly in cancers of unknown primary (CUP) and multiple primary cancers (MPC). Accurate TOO identification is critical for guiding treatment and prognosis. We developed a stacked ensemble machine learning classifier that integrates 11 multidimensional cfDNA features spanning genomic, fragmentomic, methylation/repeat, and microbial signals. Base models were constructed using five algorithms, including Deep Learning, Distributed Random Forest, Gradient Boosting Machine, Generalized Linear Model, and XGBoost, within a five-fold cross-validation framework, and their predictions were aggregated into a final ensemble optimized for top-1 accuracy. The classifier achieved robust performance across 17 cancer types, with top-1 and top-2 accuracies of 78% and 89% in the training cohort (n = 1,814), and 80% and 90% in an independent validation cohort (n = 1,221). Notably, predictive performance was retained in samples with low tumor fraction (71% top-1, 85% top-2). Sensitivity varied across tumor types, with the highest performance observed in head and neck and colorectal cancers. Among CUP cases, 11 of 15 (73.3%) predictions matched clinically inferred primary sites based on multimodal diagnostics. Feature importance analysis identified nucleosome positioning, fragment size distribution, and repeat elements as key contributors to model performance. Collectively, this cfDNA-based classifier provides a robust and non-invasive approach for accurate cancer type identification and has the potential to support clinical decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.