ArticleJournal of nuclear medicine technology2026
AI-Empowered Nuclear Medicine Education, Part 2: Practical AI Applications for Educators.
Article in Journal of nuclear medicine technology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Nuclear medicine (NM) educators face a pivotal time of rapid scientific innovation and expansion of theranostic possibilities, rising volumes, staffing shortages, and a call for more high-quality training. In the midst of this expansion, AI technologies have disrupted nearly every aspect of society, including education. Although data on higher-level educational outcomes and patient-specific outcomes are limited, the rapid acceleration and sophistication of AI capabilities is undeniable and ubiquitous, causing many educators to express feelings of uncertainty, incompetence, distrust, and fear. Current literature on AI interventions in health education is limited, often favoring general introductory discussions over the practical application of foundational learning theory and ethical frameworks. In this 3-part article series, we began in part 1 with a foundation of traditional learning theories and ethical principles related to AI use in NM education. This article focuses on the practical application and integration of those foundational principles in the NM educator workflow. Beginning with an educator-focused theoretical framework grounded in transformative and experiential learning theories, readers are encouraged to practically engage with the activities in the article to experience the benefits and failures of AI use in education. Effective AI techniques, including prompt-engineering elements, chain-of-thought prompting, retrieval-augmented generation, custom AI tool development, multimedia content creation, and vibe coding, are introduced with practical activities. Readers should experience the activities directly and reflect on the application and integration in their own educational practice. AI-enabled NM educators who model theory-informed, ethical, and grounded AI use encourage learners to do the same, building interconnected networks of healthy human-AI interactions. These educational activities are naturally scalable and efficient, but with grounded, thoughtful approaches, they can also be equitable, accurate, and personalized. Meeting the rapid dynamics of NM practice requires a rapidly evolving and scalable educational system powered by AI technologies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.