ArticleJournal of nuclear medicine technology2026
AI-Empowered Nuclear Medicine Education, Part 1: Theoretical and Ethical Foundation.
Article in Journal of nuclear medicine technology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Nuclear medicine (NM) is rapidly expanding with new radiopharmaceuticals, imaging equipment, and theranostic possibilities, necessitating a capable and competent workforce expansion. Consequently, NM education must undergo a transformation, powered in part by artificial intelligence (AI). AI is rapidly entering NM education through learner study materials, assessment design, simulation, feedback, and administrative workflows. AI's value depends less on tool novelty than on ethical alignment with effective learning principles. NM educators and trainees need practical approaches for AI tool use that preserve human judgment, accountability, critical thought, creativity, privacy, and source verification. As the first article in a 3-part series on AI-empowered NM education, this practical guide summarizes and integrates selected literature from AI in health professions education, NM education, learning theories, and ethics. Building on a framework of established learning theories (transformative learning, self-regulated learning, experiential learning, connectivism, constructivism, and cognitive load theory) and ethical concerns about AI (e.g., accuracy, bias, transparency, privacy), we describe effective AI techniques (structured prompt design, retrieval-augmented generation, meta-prompting, AI customization, vibe coding) that can be applied for the NM educator and learner in parts 2 and 3 of the series, respectively. These benefits require explicit safeguards, including AI guardrail incorporation, privacy protection, expert review, AI output transparency, and healthy skepticism. AI should be integrated into NM education through theory-informed, source-grounded, and expert-reviewed workflows. Meeting the demands of increased NM volumes and expanded professional opportunities will require AI-empowered educators and trainees that are able to self-regulate and transform their learning through healthy patterns of human-AI interaction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.