Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42552012›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2026

Biceps tenodesis with 360° suture anchor versus self-locking tenodesis in the absence of full-thickness rotator cuff tears: protocol for a non-inferiority randomised controlled trial (BLAST-2).

Dries Boulidam, Igor Jurievich Shirinskiy, Arno Alexander Macken, M P J Van Den Bekerom, Thibault Lafosse, Geert Alexander Buijze

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06772103 (Biceps Tenodesis With 360 Suture Anchor Versus Self-Locking Tenodesis in the Absence of Full-thickness Rotator Cuff Tears), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06772103 narecruitingnot on this map

Biceps Tenodesis With 360 Suture Anchor Versus Self-Locking Tenodesis in the Absence of Full-thickness Rotator Cuff Tears: Protocol for a Non-inferiority Randomized Controlled Trial (BLAST-2)

TypeinterventionalSponsorClinique Générale dAnnecyRan2025 to 2030Enrolled98ConditionsSLAP LesionArmsself-locking biceps tenodesis, Biceps Tenodesis with 360 Suture anchor
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Dries BoulidamAlps Surgery Institute, Clinique Generale d'Annecy SAS, Annecy, France d.boulidam@gmail.com.ORCID 0009-0000-8986-7767
Igor Jurievich ShirinskiyAlps Surgery Institute, Clinique Generale d'Annecy SAS, Annecy, France.ORCID 0009-0004-3192-887X
Arno Alexander MackenAlps Surgery Institute, Clinique Generale d'Annecy SAS, Annecy, France.ORCID 0000-0002-7513-7437
M P J Van Den BekeromVrije Universiteit Amsterdam Faculteit der Gedrags- en Bewegingswetenschappen, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-5146-6148
Thibault LafosseAlps Surgery Institute, Clinique Generale d'Annecy SAS, Annecy, France.
Geert Alexander BuijzeAlps Surgery Institute, Clinique Generale d'Annecy SAS, Annecy, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPathology of the long head of the biceps tendon (LHBT) is commonly treated with either tenotomy or tenodesis, which provide comparable clinical outcomes but have distinct disadvantages. A novel self-locking biceps tenodesis aims to combine the benefits of both techniques. Comparative evidence in patients without full-thickness rotator cuff tears is limited. This study aims to compare the clinical outcomes and complications of self-locking biceps tenodesis and biceps tenodesis with 360° suture anchor in patients without full-thickness rotator cuff tears. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This single-centre, double-blinded non-inferiority randomised controlled trial will include 98 patients aged≥40 years with symptomatic LHBT pathology in the absence of full-thickness rotator cuff tears. Participants will be recruited between January 2025 and January 2030 and randomly allocated to self-locking biceps tenodesis or biceps tenodesis with 360° suture anchor. The primary outcome is the Constant score at 1 year postoperatively, with a predefined non-inferiority margin of 10 points. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study received approval from the French Committee of Person Protection North-West II (national registration number 2024-A02217-40). Furthermore, the trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT06772103). Results will be disseminated through publication in peer-reviewed journals and presentation at scientific conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT06772103.

Indexed as

Rotator Cuff InjuriesSuture AnchorsTendonsTenodesisAdultDouble-Blind MethodEquivalence Trials as TopicFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRotator CuffTreatment OutcomeOrthopaedic & trauma surgeryRandomized Controlled TrialShoulder

Identifiers

PMID42552012
PMCPMC13448603

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.