ArticleBMJ open2026
F-words as core components in global early childhood development interventions: a scoping review protocol.
Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Mapping the landscape of early childhood development services: a global scoping review.BMJ open · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionEarly childhood development (ECD) interventions within global health systems support children aged 0-5 years across a range of developmental needs, including those who are typically developing (healthy), at risk of developmental delay or living with developmental disorders. These interventions address multiple domains of development, yet their conceptual integration remains variable across contexts. The F-words framework-encompassing Functionig, Family, Fitness, Fun, Friends and Future-provides a holistic, strengths-based lens for understanding child development, yet its integration across diverse health contexts remains underexplored. This scoping review protocol adopts the F-words framework as a guiding premise to examine how these components are reflected in ECD interventions globally. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This scoping review will follow Arksey and O'Malley's framework, with guidance from the Joanna Briggs Institute, using the Population-Concept-Context approach. Searches will be conducted in major international databases (eg, PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science) alongside selected regional sources and grey literature. Studies will be screened independently by two reviewers, with disagreements resolved through discussion or a third reviewer. Data will be charted using structured forms aligned with the F-words domains and synthesised narratively to identify key patterns, gaps and implementation factors. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval was confirmed by Tabriz University of Medical Sciences (IR.TBZMED.REC.1404.139); no patient involvemet occurs. Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publication and academic forums to inform research, policy and practice in ECD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.