Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42551998›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2026

Rapid consensus building to strengthen AMR surveillance in LMICs using One Health approach: a modified table-top exercise coupled with a Delphi study protocol.

Prakash Ghosh, Nicola Reck, Gisela Schneider, Judith Asin, Julius Boniface Okuni, Claude Mambo Muvunyi, Muhammad Asaduzzaman, Rea Maja Kobialka, Adel Abdelkhalek, Ariful Basher and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Prakash GhoshInstitute for Animal Hygiene and Veterinary Public Health, Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany prakash.ghosh@uni-leipzig.de.ORCID 0000-0002-4300-8761
Nicola ReckDepartment of Infectious Diseases and Critical Care Medicine, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Gisela SchneiderDifäm e.V. (German Institute for Medical Mission), Tübingen, Germany.
Judith AsinEcumenical Pharmaceutical Network, Nairobi, Kenya.
Julius Boniface OkuniVeterinary Pathobiology, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.ORCID 0000-0001-6361-7356
Claude Mambo MuvunyiRwanda Biomedical Centre, Kigali, Rwanda.
Muhammad AsaduzzamanDepartment of Community Medicine and Global Health, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0001-9048-7980
Rea Maja KobialkaInstitute for Animal Hygiene and Veterinary Public Health, Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany.ORCID 0009-0007-5114-1910
Adel AbdelkhalekFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, Badr University in Cairo, Badr, Egypt.
Ariful BasherInfectious Diseases Hospital, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Martin SiegelChair of Health Economics and Econometrics, University of Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.
Miriam Songa StegemannDepartment of Infectious Diseases and Critical Care Medicine, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Sophie SchneitlerInstitute for Medical Microbiology, Immunology, and Hygiene, University Hospital Cologne and Faculty of Medicine, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Ahmed Abd El WahedInstitute for Animal Hygiene and Veterinary Public Health, Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionImplementing integrated One Health surveillance of antimicrobial resistance (OH-AMR) remains a challenge globally, particularly in developing countries. Resource limitations, infrastructural gaps and inadequate technical capacity often hinder adherence to standardised antimicrobial resistance (AMR) surveillance guidelines, resulting in suboptimal data coverage and quality in resource-constrained settings. Moreover, considerable disparities exist in the design and execution of OH-AMR surveillance systems across regions, further complicating global data harmonisation and comparative analyses. Therefore, considering the complex ecosystem of OH-AMR and its effective implementation in the low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), a consensus-based multidisciplinary research agenda should be prioritised. In recent years, the Delphi method has become a popular tool in systematic and bias-free consensus building on a certain research domain or complex topics. Therefore, with the overarching objective of setting an operational standard for OH-AMR surveillance in LMICs, we aim to perform a Delphi study by engaging the experts from relevant domains. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: To streamline the traditional time-consuming Delphi technique, we plan to implement a real-time Table-Top Delphi exercise for rapid consensus building. Moreover, to capitalise on the convention of experts from diverse fields in real-time, we propose to conduct the study during an international conference on AMR. With systematic modification in the Delphi technique, the study will be conducted in two rounds where the first round will be performed in real-time followed by a second round online. For this purpose, a set of questions being prepared based on the identified gaps in existing scientific literature, evidence and guidelines for OH-AMR will be used. The questionnaire will be dispatched on an electronic platform to accumulate the responses from the experts in real-time while ensuring the anonymity and controlled feedback. Consensus will be defined as 70% or more of respondents selecting the same option for a given question. Considering the engagement of stakeholders from multiple domains of the trifecta, a total of 50 participants will be recruited in the study to have 70% replicable consensus where responses from at least 40 participants are expected in both rounds. The outcome of this Delphi study will pave the way for the implementation of an optimised OH-AMR surveillance strategy, especially in the global south, leading to actionable outcomes. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study will be conducted in accordance with the guidelines of the Ethics Advisory Board, Leipzig University, Germany. The Ethics Advisory Board has no concern on the study protocol (2025.08.27_eb_348) in terms of research ethics. Before participating in the survey, individuals will be required to provide informed consent through the Welphi electronic platform (Yes/No options). Participation will be entirely voluntary, and participants may withdraw their consent and discontinue participation at any stage of the study. The findings of the study will be shared with the major stakeholders including the quadripartite organisations, global and regional networks on AMR and presented in international conferences and social media forums on AMR. The outcome of the study will be published in a peer-reviewed journal.

Indexed as

ConsensusDeveloping CountriesDrug Resistance, MicrobialOne HealthDelphi TechniqueHumansResource-Limited SettingsAntibioticsEpidemiologyHealth policyPublic health

Identifiers

PMID42551998
PMCPMC13448616

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.