ArticleBMJ open2026
Exploring the reasons behind induced abortion among Iranian couples: a qualitative study.
Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundInduced abortion remains a significant reproductive health issue in Iran, shaped by complex socio-economic, cultural and legal factors. Despite its importance, limited evidence exists on the underlying motivations for seeking abortion in a context of restrictive laws and pronatalist policies.
objectivesThis study aimed to explore the reasons underlying couples' decisions to seek induced abortion within the constraints of the current legal framework.
designQualitative interview study, co-designed with couples with a history of induced abortion.
methodsWe conducted semi-structured interviews with a purposively selected sample of couples. Data analysis followed a content analysis approach and was iterative, occurring concurrently with data collection until thematic saturation was reached.
settingBaharloo, Arash and Imam Khomeini hospitals, as well as private gynaecology and midwifery clinics in Tehran, Iran, between January and November 2024.
participants32 adults participated, including 18 women who had experienced an induced abortion and 14 of their male partners, representing diverse socio-economic backgrounds.
resultsParticipants' decisions about abortion were shaped by multiple, interconnected factors. Economic pressures, including job instability and high costs of childbearing, intersected with relationship concerns, such as lack of partner support and unstable marital life. Social norms influenced choices through expectations of parenting, emphasis on individual autonomy and attitudes toward fertility. Pregnancy-related fears, including past traumatic experiences, health concerns and worries about fetal well-being, further contributed to decision-making. Finally, social uncertainty and anxieties about children's futures, along with perceived inadequacy of government support, created conditions in which continuing a pregnancy often seemed unfeasible.
conclusionCouples' decisions to seek induced abortion in Iran emerge from complex interactions between economic pressures, relational dynamics, cultural shifts, embodied experiences and structural constraints. Pro-natalist policies that fail to address these underlying factors are unlikely to reduce abortion rates. Findings underscore the need for comprehensive interventions addressing socioeconomic insecurities, relationship support and reproductive health services, while respecting couples' decision-making autonomy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.