ReviewJournal of veterinary science2026
Comparative study of the role of nitric oxide in the regulation of food intake across vertebrates.
Review in Journal of veterinary science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
importanceNitric oxide (NO), synthesized from L-arginine by nitric oxide synthases (NOS), acts as a conserved signaling molecule involved in the regulation of food intake across animal taxa. Understanding its function has gained importance in veterinary medicine, animal production, and comparative physiology, especially given species-specific differences in arginine metabolism and immune-nutritional interactions. OBSERVATIONS: This review provides a comparative synthesis of the role of NO in appetite regulation in mammals, birds, and aquatic animals, highlighting conserved mechanisms, species-specific differences, and gaps requiring further investigation. In mammals, NO modulates hypothalamic circuits controlling satiety and hunger in a bidirectional, energy-dependent manner. Birds, lacking endogenous arginine synthesis, show reduced feed intake with elevated NO levels. In fish, NO-especially via agmatine-suppresses feeding by downregulating orexigenic signals and enhancing insulin-mediated pathways. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: NO functions as a conserved but flexible regulator of food intake across taxa. Future studies employing molecular, nutritional, and behavioral tools are needed to clarify species-specific mechanisms and optimize NO-targeted feeding strategies in production animals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.