ArticleBMJ mental health2026
Lithium for the prevention of suicide in US veterans: a target trial emulation.
Article in BMJ mental health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundLithium has long been considered to reduce suicidal behaviour in patients with affective disorders, but evidence from large real-world populations remains limited.
objectiveTo estimate the effects of lithium initiation and continuation on suicide deaths and non-lethal suicidal behaviours among adults with bipolar disorder or major depressive disorder.
methodsWe emulated two target trials using electronic health records and administrative claims from US veterans between January 2010 and December 2022. The first trial benchmarked results against the CSP-590 randomised trial by estimating the 1-year risk of suicide-related events (non-fatal suicide attempts, hospitalisations to prevent suicide or suicide deaths) among patients with a recent suicide attempt initiating lithium versus not initiating lithium. The second trial extended follow-up to 10 years to estimate risks of suicide deaths and non-lethal suicidal behaviours separately, including subgroup analyses by age and diagnosis. An additional analysis removed the requirement of a prior suicide attempt.
findingsIn the benchmarking analysis, the 1-year risk ratio for suicide-related events comparing lithium initiation with no initiation was 1.06 (95% CI 1.01 to 1.12), consistent with findings from the CSP-590 trial. In the extended analysis, the 10-year per-protocol risk ratio for suicide death was 1.00 (95% CI 0.86 to 1.15) and for non-lethal suicidal behaviours was 0.96 (95% CI 0.90 to 1.02). Results were similar among individuals with and without a prior suicide attempt.
conclusionWhen added to ongoing pharmacological treatment for patients with affective disorders, lithium may not substantially reduce suicide risk highlighting the need for additional suicide prevention strategies in this population. Limitations include lack of information on adherence, dosage or blood levels of lithium which may have obscured existing differences. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Our findings suggest that adding lithium therapy to the ongoing treatment regimens of patients with affective disorders for the sole purpose of reducing suicide may not be well-tolerated or meaningfully reduce suicide risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.