ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2026
Group recognition in the German cockroach, a subsocial omnivore, is based on faecal odour preference that is modulated by coprophagy, diet and learning.
Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Group recognition in the German cockroach, a subsocial omnivore, is based on faecal odour preference that is modulated by coprophagy, diet and learning.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Faecal odours attract cockroaches to aggregations, where conspecific faeces provide nutrients and seed the gut microbiota. Because these odours arise from the gut and faecal microbial communities, which are shaped by coprophagy and diet, discrete aggregations within a heterogeneous landscape can produce distinct faecal odour profiles. How such odour diversity influences recognition, group affiliation and ultimately aggregation remains unclear. We manipulated coprophagy and then diet quality in gnotobiotic nymphs to generate groups with distinct faecal odour signatures, then raised them to the adult stage and collected their faeces for behavioural assays. Naive nymphs lacking coprophagy experience were equally attracted to faecal odours from all treatment groups, suggesting an innate attraction to conspecific faeces. By contrast, experienced nymphs preferred the faecal odour of their natal group over foreign groups, suggesting learned group-specific recognition. In associative learning assays pairing a faecal odour with a glucose reward, nymphs preferentially aggregated with the conditioned odour over novel odours. These results show that aggregation in neonate cockroaches is mediated by both an innate attraction to conspecific faecal odour and learned preferences for specific odourants encountered during coprophagy soon after they hatch. We propose that these mechanisms guide neonates towards natal aggregations, facilitating acquisition of a locally adapted gut microbial community.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.