Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42551871›Full record

GuidelineKorean journal of radiology2026

Comprehensive Computed Tomography Evaluation of Gastric Cancer: 2026 Consensus Recommendation From the Korean Society of Abdominal Radiology.

Jae Seok Bae, Se Hyung Kim, Soon Nam Oh, Jin Woong Kim, Jeongin Yoo, Min Ju Kim, Sang Min Lee, Mi Hye Yu, Jeong Eun Lee, Cheong-Il Shin

Abstract readConsensus StatementPractice GuidelineReview
In one paragraph

Guideline in Korean journal of radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Jae Seok BaeDepartment of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2768-7917
Se Hyung KimDepartment of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8664-0356
Soon Nam OhDepartment of Radiology, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2373-7024
Jin Woong KimDepartment of Radiology, Chosun University Hospital, Chosun University College of Medicine, Gwangju, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4725-5687
Jeongin YooDepartment of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3267-2544
Min Ju KimDepartment of Radiology, Korea University Anam Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0979-9835
Sang Min LeeDepartment of Radiology, CHA University, CHA Gangnam Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7719-3849
Mi Hye YuDepartment of Radiology, Konkuk University Medical Center, Research Institute of Medical Science, Konkuk University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0519-7853
Jeong Eun LeeDepartment of Radiology, Chungnam National University Hospital, Chungnam National University College of Medicine, Daejeon, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9566-7489
Cheong-Il ShinDepartment of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5457-4523

Funding

Korean Society of Abdominal RadiologyKorean Society of RadiologySeoul National University Hospital 04-2026-0280
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gastric cancer continues to be a significant global health challenge, particularly in East Asia, necessitating precise imaging for optimal management. Although multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) has become the primary tool for staging and response evaluation, clinical practice is hampered by a lack of standardized protocols and interpretation criteria. To address these needs, the Korean Society of Abdominal Radiology established a consensus-based guideline for gastric cancer CT. Using a modified Delphi process with a panel of experts, 10 key statements were developed and validated with a high level of agreement (≥80%). These recommendations emphasize the necessity of adequate gastric distention and a dedicated arterial phase to identify critical vascular variations, such as aberrant left hepatic arteries, for surgical planning. The guideline provides refined criteria for T, N, and M staging, including the use of multiplanar reformations and three-dimensional visualization to improve diagnostic accuracy. Furthermore, it introduces dedicated criteria for re-staging after chemotherapy, highlighting the differentiation of viable tumor from treatment-induced fibrosis. Finally, a risk-stratified approach for postoperative surveillance is proposed, suggesting that surveillance may be de-escalated in very-low-risk groups, such as pT1aN0 disease. These recommendations are intended to standardize CT practice and improve clinical decision-making in the management of gastric cancer.

Indexed as

Multidetector Computed TomographyStomach NeoplasmsTomography, X-Ray ComputedHumansNeoplasm StagingRepublic of KoreaSocieties, MedicalComputed tomographyConsensusGastric cancerGuidelineSurveillance

Identifiers

PMID42551871
PMCPMC13537874

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.