GuidelineKorean journal of radiology2026
Comprehensive Computed Tomography Evaluation of Gastric Cancer: 2026 Consensus Recommendation From the Korean Society of Abdominal Radiology.
Guideline in Korean journal of radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Gastric cancer continues to be a significant global health challenge, particularly in East Asia, necessitating precise imaging for optimal management. Although multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) has become the primary tool for staging and response evaluation, clinical practice is hampered by a lack of standardized protocols and interpretation criteria. To address these needs, the Korean Society of Abdominal Radiology established a consensus-based guideline for gastric cancer CT. Using a modified Delphi process with a panel of experts, 10 key statements were developed and validated with a high level of agreement (≥80%). These recommendations emphasize the necessity of adequate gastric distention and a dedicated arterial phase to identify critical vascular variations, such as aberrant left hepatic arteries, for surgical planning. The guideline provides refined criteria for T, N, and M staging, including the use of multiplanar reformations and three-dimensional visualization to improve diagnostic accuracy. Furthermore, it introduces dedicated criteria for re-staging after chemotherapy, highlighting the differentiation of viable tumor from treatment-induced fibrosis. Finally, a risk-stratified approach for postoperative surveillance is proposed, suggesting that surveillance may be de-escalated in very-low-risk groups, such as pT1aN0 disease. These recommendations are intended to standardize CT practice and improve clinical decision-making in the management of gastric cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.