ReviewCurrent opinion in plant biology2026
Beyond prediction: Why experimental structural biology remains essential in plants.
Review in Current opinion in plant biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Structural biology is undergoing a transformative era driven by advances in artificial intelligence (AI)-based protein structure prediction and cryo-electron microscopy. Predictive approaches have dramatically expanded structural coverage across proteomes and are increasingly integrated into experimental workflows. However, protein function frequently depends on dynamic molecular processes including ligand-dependent conformational remodeling, transient interactions, cooperative assembly, and transport-state transitions that remain difficult to define from static computational models alone. These challenges are particularly evident in plants, where signaling pathways often involve environmentally responsive receptor complexes, lineage-expanded regulatory proteins, and transient assemblies. Here, we discuss how experimental structural biology continues to advance plant biology by revealing mechanisms underlying hormone perception, immune receptor activation, transporter function, and enzymatic regulation. From early landmark discoveries such as the crystallization of urease to recent cryo-electron microscopy studies of dynamic signaling complexes, plant systems have repeatedly uncovered molecular architectures, chemically modified intermediates, and regulatory principles that require direct structural and biochemical characterization. Plant proteins also remain markedly underrepresented in structural databases, leaving many plant-specific pathways structurally unresolved. Together, these observations highlight the continuing importance of experimental structural biology for defining biologically relevant molecular states and enabling structure-guided strategies for crop improvement and agricultural biotechnology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.