ArticleJMIR medical education2026
Attitudes Toward Digital Planetary Health Before and After a Lecture Series on Environmental Awareness and Future Visions: Repeated Cross-Sectional Survey Study Regarding Twin Transformation.
Article in JMIR medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The focus on sustainability in university teaching and education about the climate catastrophe is constantly increasing and is essential for creating change. The chances offered by digital technological innovations are decisive in spotlighting planetary health education. Alongside welfare economies and social movements, they are among the areas with great potential to drive sustainable development. Objective: This study aimed to evaluate attitudes toward digital planetary health before and after a fully digital planetary health lecture series. This included assessing environmental health awareness, climate-related health risks, and perceptions of the need to integrate digital and planetary health education into university curricula. Methods: A repeated, pseudonymous, nonexperimental, cross-sectional online survey was conducted before (T1) and after (T2) a fully digital lecture series on digital planetary health during the 2022-2023 winter term. Because participant matching across time points was unsuccessful, descriptive analyses were conducted at the group level. Results: A total of 180 participants completed the T1 survey, and 79 participants completed the T2 survey. The mean age in the T1 survey was 27.92 (SD 10.95) years, with a minimum age of 18 years and a maximum age of 77 years. The mean age in T2 was 29.22 (SD 12.78) years, with a minimum age of 18 years and a maximum age of 78 years. In the T2 survey, 70.9% (56/79) of the participants rated it as "(very) important" (mean 5.38, SD 1.15) to incorporate climate-related health impacts and digital health issues into their studies. In the T2 survey, 51.9% (41/79) of the participants stated that the range of educational events on digital health at universities was inadequate. Qualitative responses highlighted perceived benefits of digitalization for collaboration, knowledge dissemination, and health care access, while concerns regarding resource consumption and ethical challenges were also described. Conclusions: Participants who attended the lecture series perceived digital planetary health as highly relevant to university education. The findings provide exploratory insights into attitudes toward the integration of planetary health and digital health topics into higher education curricula.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.