ArticleRambam Maimonides medical journal2026
Physician-assigned Diagnosis Versus Questionnaire-based Measures in Individuals with Nociceptive, Neuropathic, and Nociplastic Pain: A Mechanism-based Characterization of Chronic Pain Patients.
Article in Rambam Maimonides medical journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe International Association for the Study of Pain (IASP) has defined three mechanisms for chronic pain: nociceptive, neuropathic, and nociplastic. Accurate differentiation between these mechanisms is essential for treatment selection but remains challenging due to symptom overlap and reliance on clinical judgment. Patient-reported questionnaires may support diagnosis, though their diagnostic accuracy relative to physician assessment has not been fully established.
objectivesThis study aimed to investigate the prevalence and overlap of chronic pain mechanisms in a tertiary pain clinic population and to compare physician-assigned diagnoses with results from patient-reported questionnaires.
methodsThis cross-sectional study recruited 89 adult patients with chronic pain from the Rambam Institute for Pain Medicine at Rambam Health Care Campus in Haifa, Israel. Each participant underwent a comprehensive physician evaluation based on the criteria of the International Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, 11th revision, and completed the Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI), PainDETECT, and 2016 American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Fibromyalgia Diagnostic Criteria surveys. Diagnostic agreement, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated using physician diagnosis as the reference standard.
resultsPhysician diagnoses identified neuropathic pain in 51 patients (57.3%), nociceptive pain in 38 (42.7%), and nociplastic pain in 25 (28.1%), with substantial diagnostic overlap (32.6% with ≥2 mechanisms). The CSI demonstrated high sensitivity (92.0%) but low specificity (45.3%) for nociplastic pain. PainDETECT showed moderate accuracy for neuropathic pain (sensitivity 68.6%, specificity 52.6%) and higher specificity for nociceptive pain (86.3%). The 2016 ACR Fibromyalgia criteria provided a more balanced diagnostic profile (sensitivity 88.0%, specificity 68.8%).
conclusionsQuestionnaire-based measures are useful for screening chronic pain mechanisms but demonstrate variable accuracy when compared to physician diagnoses, particularly in the context of overlapping pain phenotypes. Refinement of diagnostic thresholds, combined assessment strategies, and updated questionnaires may improve differentiation of pain subtypes and enhance clinical decision-making.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.