ArticlePloS one2026
Numerical investigation structural protection measures for riverbank due to flood flow-driven damage.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A three-dimensional Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) model was employed to investigate the impact of structural protection measures on riverbanks subjected to flood flow-driven damage. Three structural approaches are applied to a case study the downstream river of Cua Dat spillway: (i) three groups of submerged groynes with varying height ratios R = 1.04, 2.13 and 3.14 of flow depth (do) to groyne height (hg), (ii) detention zones and (iii) concrete lining. Several hydraulic characteristics at near-bank flow, such as Qvortex, near-bank velocity (Vbank) and impact load (F) acting on bank protection slabs. Groups of submerged groynes redirect high-velocity flow toward the mainstream, which may jeopardize the integrity of bridge piers. The lower-submergence scenario (R = 1.04) generates maximum impact forces on the upper slab layer approximately 3.5 times greater than those induced by no protection measure. Results indicate that excavating natural detention zones along the left riverbank, in combination with concrete lining on the right riverbank, effectively reduces flood risk not only at structurally vulnerable zones but also at the bridge. These findings provide practical insights into the hydraulic performance of structural measures for riverbank stabilization in high-risk spillway environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.