Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42550850›Full record

ArticlePLOS digital health2026

MRI-based shear stress profiles in subclinical carotid atherosclerosis - A feasibility study.

Sanne C M van Kuijk, Bernhard P Berghout, Suze-Anne Korteland, Robin Y R Camarasa, Marleen de Bruijne, Daniel Bos, Ali C Akyildiz, M Kamran Ikram, Jolanda J Wentzel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS digital health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Sanne C M van KuijkDepartment of Epidemiology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-9776-6745
Bernhard P BerghoutDepartment of Epidemiology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Suze-Anne KortelandDepartment of Cardiology, Biomedical Engineering, Cardiovascular Institute, Thorax Center, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Robin Y R CamarasaDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Marleen de BruijneDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6328-902X
Daniel BosDepartment of Epidemiology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Ali C AkyildizDepartment of Cardiology, Biomedical Engineering, Cardiovascular Institute, Thorax Center, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5900-0425
M Kamran IkramDepartment of Epidemiology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Jolanda J WentzelDepartment of Cardiology, Biomedical Engineering, Cardiovascular Institute, Thorax Center, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Arterial wall shear stress (WSS) plays an important role in atherosclerosis, but its assessment is often limited to small, retrospective studies due to technical and time constraints. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of WSS assessment in carotid arteries within the long-running, population-based Rotterdam Study. We developed a semi-automated computational fluid dynamics (CFD) pipeline, using deep-learning-based lumen segmentations of the carotid arteries from BlackBlood MRI and participant-specific common carotid blood flow from 3D phase-contrast MRA. Steady-state CFD simulations generated WSS profiles of the common and internal carotid arteries. Feasibility was evaluated by applying the pipeline to both carotid arteries in a sample of the Rotterdam Study, and reliability was assessed through inter- and intra-rater analyses. Simulations were successfully performed on both carotid arteries of 100 participants (mean age, 72.6 years ± 10.6 [SD]; 49 female). Automated lumen segmentations showed good agreement with manual segmentations (Dice similarity coefficient 0.89 ± 0.02). Intra- and inter-rater reliability analyses indicated good to excellent reliability of the pipeline, with intra-class correlation coefficients ranging from 0.89 to 0.98. This study demonstrates the feasibility of the CFD-based pipeline for large-scale carotid WSS assessment, integrating participant-specific carotid blood flow and automated segmentations. The reliability analyses underscore the reproducibility of the pipeline and highlight its potential for efficient, scalable carotid WSS analysis, making the pipeline suitable for application in large population-based and clinical studies.

Identifiers

PMID42550850
PMCPMC13436755

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.