Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42550848›Full record

ArticleThe European journal of general practice2026

EGPRN primary care research at a crossroads advancing research on interprofessional collaboration and on integrated, equitable and complex care. An EGPRN Keynote Paper from the Autumn 2025 Plovdiv Conference.

Paul Van Royen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The European journal of general practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Paul Van RoyenFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Department of Family Medicine and Population Health, University of Antwerp, Antwerpen, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Primary healthcare is facing unprecedented complexity, driven by multimorbidity, social vulnerability, health inequities, rapid digitalisation, and shifting professional roles. This opinion paper argues that strengthening primary care requires a fundamental reorientation of both research agendas and professional education. We propose a shift towards innovative, theory-informed methodologies capable of capturing how care works in practice, for whom, and under which conditions. Priority research domains include integrated care, interprofessional teamwork, the biopsychosocial health interface, care for vulnerable and superdiverse populations, and the responsible implementation of digital and AI-supported tools. To capture these dynamics, we advocate for innovative methodologies including longitudinal mixed-methods designs, pragmatic cluster trials, realist evaluation, implementation science, network analysis, and complexity science approaches. Participatory and practice-based research models are essential to ensure relevance and reduce research waste. Finally, we emphasise the need to embed research literacy, interprofessional learning, and digital competence within transformative education for future family physicians.

Indexed as

Delivery of Health Care, IntegratedHealth Services ResearchInterprofessional RelationsPrimary Health CareCooperative BehaviorHumansPatient Care Teamintegrated careinterprofessional collaborationprimary careResearch agendaresearch methodology

Identifiers

PMID42550848
PMCPMC13439774

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.