Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42550842›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Career outcomes of PhD holders in Africa: Protocol for a scoping review.

Aimee Haley, Alebachew Kemisso Haybano, Gun-Britt Wärvik

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Aimee HaleyDepartment of Education and Special Education, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4658-4430
Alebachew Kemisso HaybanoCentre for Comparative Education and Policy Studies, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Gun-Britt WärvikDepartment of Education and Special Education, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to outline a protocol for a scoping review that will map current research on PhD holders' career outcomes in Africa. The aim of the scoping review is threefold. First, it seeks to examine the predominant conceptual and theoretical frameworks, as well as the methodological approaches, used in existing research. Second, the review aims to assess the extent to which academic and non-academic careers are addressed within the current literature. Lastly, the scoping review intends to identify the systemic, institutional, and individual-level conditions that contribute to shaping research careers. Four electronic journal databases were searched for peer-reviewed articles in English that focused on the African context: Web of Science, Scopus, the Sabinet Social Sciences and Humanities Journal Database, and Education Research Complete. No restrictions were placed on publication year, with searches including studies published up to 2025. The abstracts and titles of the sources resulting from this search will be screened against the established eligibility criteria, and data will be extracted and analyzed from those sources that meet the inclusion criteria. The findings from this scoping review will be useful for research leaders, as well as those responsible for the professional development of researchers who seek to establish career development initiatives. This review will also point out research gaps in career-related literature on PhD holders in Africa.

Indexed as

Career ChoiceEducation, GraduateResearch PersonnelAcademiaAfricaHumansScoping Reviews as Topic

Identifiers

PMID42550842
PMCPMC13436724

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.