ArticlePloS one2026
In-class AI usage and university students' attitudes: The mediating role of perceived learning engagement benefits.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
With the widespread adoption of artificial intelligence (AI), the usage of various AI tools by university students to support learning has become increasingly common in classroom settings. Focusing on routine in-class AI usage and learning engagement, this study explores the mediating role of perceived learning engagement benefits in linking students' AI usage behavior to their attitudes, and investigates whether its mediating effects differ across various dimensions of learning engagement. Based on data from 287 questionnaires, structural equation modeling and Bayesian analysis were used to test the proposed hypotheses. The results indicate that in-class AI usage was associated with students' attitudes both directly and also indirectly by enhancing cognitive engagement and emotional engagement, both of which exhibited comparable mediating effects. In general, the university students exhibited positive attitudes toward in-class AI usage, and these attitudes were positively associated with their perceived learning engagement benefits. These results suggest that the value of AI in classroom settings may relate not only to learning efficiency, but also to students' learning experiences, particularly in terms of perceived cognitive and emotional engagement benefits. Notably, although in-class AI usage was positively associated with all dimensions of perceived engagement benefits, perceived behavioral engagement benefits showed no significant indirect effect on attitudes. This null finding warrants further exploration in future research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.