ArticlePloS one2026
Barriers to accessing paediatric critical care and surgery: A qualitative study.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCertain groups of children and young people (CYP) living in the North East and North Cumbria (NENC) present late to paediatric critical care (PCC) and surgery in children (SIC) services, resulting in poorer clinical outcomes. This suggests inequitable access; however, the factors influencing access to these services are presently unclear.
aimTo explore inequitable access to PCC and SIC for CYP and inform recommendations for service improvement.
designQualitative study using semi-structured interviews.
settingCommunity settings in NENC, United Kingdom.
participantsCYP with experience of PCC/SIC, their caregivers, healthcare professionals, and charity staff. ANALYSIS: Data were analysed using a combined deductive-inductive approach, informed by the UK Paediatric Critical Care Society Quality Standards.
resultsBarriers to access were grouped into three categories: communication, system-level, and socio-economic factors. Communication and system-level barriers align with existing quality standards, whereas socio-economic influences are not explicitly addressed but play a significant role in shaping access for some families.
conclusionAccess to PCC and SIC is shaped by interacting communication, system, and socio-economic factors that may delay timely care. Greater recognition of socio-economic influences within service standards and policy may support more equitable access. Further research should focus on improving engagement with CYP and caregivers from underrepresented groups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.