ArticleBlood purification2026
Erratum.
Article in Blood purification, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum for
Authors and funding
0 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In the article "Extracorporeal Blood Purification with the oXiris® Filter for Patients with Sepsis and Hyperinflammatory Conditions: The Asia-Pacific oXiris Expert Meeting 2024 Consensus Statements" [Blood Purif. 2025;54(11):621-638; https://doi.org/10.1159/000548214] by Zhang et al., the authors noticed there was an error in Figure 1.Fig. 1.Treatment algorithm for oXiris filter use in patients needing CRRT with sepsis/septic shock, severe COVID-19 or other hyperinflammatory states. AKI, acute kidney injury; APACHE, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation; CRP, C-reactive protein; CRRT, continuous renal replacement therapy; CVVH, continuous veno-venous hemofiltration; CVVHD, continuous veno-venous hemodialysis; CVVHDF, continuous veno-venous hemodiafiltration; EAA, endotoxin activity assay; ECMO, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation; HIT, heparin-induced thrombocytopenia; SOFA, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment; KDIGO, Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes; PCT, procalcitonin; IL, interleukin; PaO2/FiO2, partial pressure-to-fractional inspired oxygen ratio; SCUF, slow continuous ultrafiltration; TNF, tumor necrosis factor.In the "Failure" column of the "Evaluate treatment success/failure" section, the figure originally stated: "Improvement in hemodynamic parameters/dependence on vasopressors after 72 hours." The word "No" was inadvertently omitted at the beginning of this criterion. The correct statement should read: "No improvement in hemodynamic parameters/dependence on vasopressors after 72 hours."The error was introduced during the preparation of the figure. The correct wording has been verified by cross-referencing the figure with Statement 5.1 in the main text (p. 630) and Table 1 (p. 625), both of which consistently and correctly state the treatment futility criterion as: "No improvement in hemodynamic parameters/dependence on vasopressors after 72 hours." The corrected Figure 1 is shown below.
Identifiers
42550780What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.