Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42550728›Full record

ArticleThe western journal of emergency medicine2026

Opioid Overdose-Related Emergency Department Visits Pre- and Post-COVID-19.

Melanie F Molina, Samuel D Pimentel, Maria C Raven, Kathy T LeSaint, David G Dillon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The western journal of emergency medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Melanie F MolinaUniversity of California, San Francisco, Department of Emergency Medicine, San Francisco, California.
Samuel D PimentelUniversity of California, Berkeley, Department of Statistics, Berkeley, California.
Maria C RavenUniversity of California, San Francisco, Department of Emergency Medicine, San Francisco, California.
Kathy T LeSaintUniversity of California, San Francisco, Department of Emergency Medicine, San Francisco, California.
David G DillonUniversity of California, Davis, Department of Emergency Medicine, Sacramento, California.

Funding

Using Clinical Decision Support to Provide Social Risk-Informed Care for Opioid Use Disorder in the Emergency DepartmentK23DA060993 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI Melanie Frances Molina · 2024 to 2026
$570k
NIDA NIH HHS K23 DA060993NIDA NIH HHS L60 DA061280
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionUnderstanding changes in opioid overdose-related emergency department (ED) visits and ED-based opioid use disorder (OUD) treatment post-coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic can inform ongoing efforts to address the opioid crisis. We aimed to examine trends in opioid overdose-related ED visits, ED-based medication for OUD (MOUD) treatment, and appendicitis-related ED visits (as a control) before and after the initial COVID-19 peak in April 2020.

methodsWe conducted an interrupted time series analysis of monthly ED visits from January 2017-December 2022 at three hospitals in California. We modeled pre- and post-COVID-19 visit trends and the change in trend from pre- to post-COVID-19 peak using linear regression controlling for study site. Our primary outcome included monthly rates of opioid overdose-related ED visits, with monthly rates of ED visits with MOUD treatment as a secondary outcome. Appendicitis-related visits served as a control for temporal trends.

resultsOf the 781,488 ED visits across the entire study period, there were 2,536 (0.32%) opioid overdose-related visits, 9,755 (1.25%) MOUD treatment visits, and 1,123 (0.14%) appendicitis-related visits. Pre-pandemic, monthly increases were observed in opioid overdose-related visits (6.7 visits/10,000 per month, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.6-10.8, P = .001), MOUD-positive visits (34.9 visits/10,000 per month, 95% CI, 26.0-43.7, P < .001), and appendicitis visits (2.5 visits/10,000 per month, 95% CI, 1.2-3.9, P < .001). After April 2020, only MOUD-positive visits showed an immediate (level change) increase (49 visits/10,000 or 34% of April 2020 projected pre-COVID-19 visit rates, 95% CI, 26.1-71.9, P < .001), with opioid overdose-related visits subsequently declining (-4.6 visits/10,000 per month or -11% of April 2020 projected pre-COVID-19 visit rates, 95% CI, -7.2 to -2.0, P = .001). Across the entire pre- to post-COVID-19 period, significant decreases in overall visit trends were observed across all visit types, greatest for MOUD-positive visits (-39.2 visits/10,000 per month, or -27% of April 2020 projected pre-COVID-19 visit rates, 95% CI, -51.5 to -26.8, P < .001), followed by opioid overdose visits (-11.3 visits/10,000 per month, or -27% of April 2020 projected pre-COVID-19 visit rates, 95% CI, -16.1 to -6.5, P < .001) and appendicitis visits (-4.2 visits/10,000 per month, or -23% of April 2020 projected pre-COVID-19 visit rates, 95% CI, -7.2 to -1.2, P = .01).

conclusionFrom pre- to post-initial COVID-19 peak, absolute ED-based MOUD treatment trends declined over three times faster than those of opioid overdose-related ED visits (although percentage changes relative to expected April 2020 rates were both -27%). These findings may reflect reduced perceived urgency as overdose presentations decreased and a shift away from crisis-driven implementation, underscoring the need for intentional integration of MOUD into routine ED practice to sustain treatment capacity.

Indexed as

COVID-19Drug OverdoseEmergency Room VisitsEmergency Service, HospitalOpiate OverdoseOpioid-Related DisordersAnalgesics, OpioidCaliforniaHumansInterrupted Time Series AnalysisOpiate Substitution TreatmentPandemicsSARS-CoV-2Analgesics, Opioid

Identifiers

PMID42550728
PMCPMC13436652

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.